<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING in ArcGIS GeoStatistical Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51098#M126</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no nugget for the cross-covariance (it's not wrong to say that nugget = 0).&amp;nbsp; The Major Range is shared between all three models (the semivariogram for the primary, semivariogram for the secondary, and cross-covariance between them).&amp;nbsp; The indices for the Partial Sill indicate the model.&amp;nbsp; Partial Sill [0][0] is for the primary dataset, Partial Sill [1][1] is for the secondary dataset, and Partial Sill [0][1] is for the cross-covariance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your model, the cross-covariance is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type = Gaussian&lt;BR /&gt;Nugget = 0&lt;BR /&gt;Range = 150.5006&lt;BR /&gt;Partial Sill = -0.001909066&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sill is the partial sill plus the nugget, so for your model, you can just call&amp;nbsp;it the sill instead of the partial sill, since the nugget is 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-09T17:42:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51095#M123</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a junior researcher and not fully experience in Geostatistical Analyst, so I hope someone can help me with the following.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How do I interpret a negative cross-variogram (Figure)? I can't understand the parameters, nugget is zero for cross-variogram, is that it? Because I have the nugget of Z1, Z2 and I do not have the Z1 x Z2. Only the partial sill.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ramon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 01:45:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51095#M123</guid>
      <dc:creator>RamonLeite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-07T01:45:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51096#M124</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Ramon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A negative cross-covariance means that the primary and secondary datasets are negatively spatially correlated.&amp;nbsp; Kriging assumes that each dataset is&amp;nbsp;positively autocorrelated with itself, but the two datasets are allowed to be negatively correlated with each other.&amp;nbsp; This means that&amp;nbsp;areas where&amp;nbsp;one dataset has a large value, the other dataset tends to have a small value (and vice versa), and kriging is able to use this information to improve the predicted values of the primary dataset.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Eric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:37:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51096#M124</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T15:37:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51097#M125</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks so much for the feedback&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I can understand the conceptual part, I can not interpret the cross variogram generated in arcgis, what would be the Nuggut, would be zero? You can take a look at the figure, please.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Ramon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 15:49:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51097#M125</guid>
      <dc:creator>RamonLeite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T15:49:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51098#M126</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no nugget for the cross-covariance (it's not wrong to say that nugget = 0).&amp;nbsp; The Major Range is shared between all three models (the semivariogram for the primary, semivariogram for the secondary, and cross-covariance between them).&amp;nbsp; The indices for the Partial Sill indicate the model.&amp;nbsp; Partial Sill [0][0] is for the primary dataset, Partial Sill [1][1] is for the secondary dataset, and Partial Sill [0][1] is for the cross-covariance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For your model, the cross-covariance is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Type = Gaussian&lt;BR /&gt;Nugget = 0&lt;BR /&gt;Range = 150.5006&lt;BR /&gt;Partial Sill = -0.001909066&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sill is the partial sill plus the nugget, so for your model, you can just call&amp;nbsp;it the sill instead of the partial sill, since the nugget is 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51098#M126</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T17:42:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CROSS-VARIOGRAM NEGATIVE -COKRING</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51099#M127</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Understood. Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Ramon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 17:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/cross-variogram-negative-cokring/m-p/51099#M127</guid>
      <dc:creator>RamonLeite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T17:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

