<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Geostatistical wizard - Cokriging - model equations under variogram in ArcGIS GeoStatistical Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43354#M116</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have to use ordinary cokriging (variables are precipitations and elevation).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I build an automatic model (in model builder) to perform interpolation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, when I build the .xml&amp;nbsp; file (reference file) with the geostatistical wizard why the last equation noted when we fit variograms and Cov. aren�??t the same when we open again the model in the method properties after computation?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don�??t understand why parameters of the first variable (first variogram) are automatically applied to the model (nugget and partial sill), other parameters are the same. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It�??s not possible to have specific parameters for each variable and so each variogram and to keep them as we want (in the model equation under the variogram) ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Maybe there is something I don't understand with the use of several fit-models .....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For examples: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Manual fitting and&amp;nbsp; Reopening of the method properties after computation: see model equations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:59:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>N_G_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-02T10:59:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geostatistical wizard - Cokriging - model equations under variogram</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43354#M116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have to use ordinary cokriging (variables are precipitations and elevation).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I build an automatic model (in model builder) to perform interpolation. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, when I build the .xml&amp;nbsp; file (reference file) with the geostatistical wizard why the last equation noted when we fit variograms and Cov. aren�??t the same when we open again the model in the method properties after computation?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don�??t understand why parameters of the first variable (first variogram) are automatically applied to the model (nugget and partial sill), other parameters are the same. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It�??s not possible to have specific parameters for each variable and so each variogram and to keep them as we want (in the model equation under the variogram) ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Maybe there is something I don't understand with the use of several fit-models .....&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For examples: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Manual fitting and&amp;nbsp; Reopening of the method properties after computation: see model equations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:59:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43354#M116</guid>
      <dc:creator>N_G_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-02T10:59:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geostatistical wizard - Cokriging - model equations under variogram</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43355#M117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The first graphic is the semivariogram for variable 2 (elevation), and the second graphic is for variable 1 (precipitation).&amp;nbsp; You can see this at the top-right of each graphic: "Between: Var2 - Var2" and "Between: Var1 - Var1".&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The first graphic is pulling Nugget[1][1] and Partial Sill[1][1] from all models.&amp;nbsp; Graphic 2 is pulling Nugget[0][0] and Partial Sill[0][0].&amp;nbsp; The cross-covariance (not pictured) between elevation and precipitation is from Nugget[0][1] and Partial Sill[0][1].&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm not seeing any problems with the graphics you posted.&amp;nbsp; Can you try to clarify your question?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 13:47:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43355#M117</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-02T13:47:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geostatistical wizard - Cokriging - model equations under variogram</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43356#M118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: Nagosa&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for your answer.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, what I want to know is: why, when we adjust variograms:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1- Precipitation variogram [Var 1&amp;nbsp; -Var 1];&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2 - cross-variograms [Var1][Var 2]; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3 - Elevation variogram [Var 2 - Var 2]; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;we have one type of model equation (equation under the variogram, manual_image.jpg), as follow:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Model:70658*Nugget+0*Spherical(129460,56953,90,0)+56868*Spherical(25056,25056,0,0)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+1748700*Gaussian(129460,93934,100,4)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[1]*Nugget+ partial Sill [Elevation, model1 ]*Spherical(major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+partial Sill [Elevation, model2 ]*Spherical(major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+partial Sill [Elevation, model3 ]*Gaussian(major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And after cross-validation and the record of the .xml model we have (when we come back to method properties in the co-kriging data) this equation and not the first shown above, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style:italic;"&gt;i.e.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; (after_computation.jpg): &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Model: 25,326*Nugget+0*Spherical(129460,56953,90,0)+182.42*Spherical(25056,25056,0,0)+61,062*Gaussiant(129460, 93934,100,4)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;[0]*Nugget+ partial Sill [precipitation, model1 ]*Spherical(same major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+partial Sill [precipitation, model2 ]*Spherical( same major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;+partial Sill [precipitation model3 ]*Gaussian( same major range,minor range,anisotropy direction)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does the geostastical wizard used the first or the second model equation to compute data? It's not clear. If we want to keep our adjustment equation (the first): how can we do and is it possible?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's one of the elements which are not clear for me.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I hope that explanations are more clear?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for your help.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 07:12:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43356#M118</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-05T07:12:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geostatistical wizard - Cokriging - model equations under variogram</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43357#M119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Does the geostastical wizard used the first or the second model equation to compute data? &lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It uses both.&amp;nbsp; When you do cokriging, you have to model the primary variable (Var 1), the secondary variable (Var 2), and the cross-covariance between the primary and secondary variable (Var1 - Var 2).&amp;nbsp; The cokriging equations require you to model all three processes to make predictions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-geostatistical-analyst-questions/geostatistical-wizard-cokriging-model-equations/m-p/43357#M119</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricKrause</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-05T14:09:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

