<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Improve ground control positioning in ArcGIS Flight Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-flight-ideas/improve-ground-control-positioning/idi-p/1381929</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As a user that is switch over from Agisoft Metashape, I appreciate Site Scans accuracy in automatically incorporating ground control points. However, when truing up the positions of the GCPs in Sitescan, you can only view tiny, low resolution thumbnails. This is inferior to Metashape that allows you to view the full size image in full resolution to pinpoint GCPs. On a recent flight, I used my black and white markers for GCPs but also shot debris on the beach as GCP. Sitescan located the black and white markers but did not locate/incorporate the debris shots.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoeFaries</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-13T21:52:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Improve ground control positioning</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-flight-ideas/improve-ground-control-positioning/idi-p/1381929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As a user that is switch over from Agisoft Metashape, I appreciate Site Scans accuracy in automatically incorporating ground control points. However, when truing up the positions of the GCPs in Sitescan, you can only view tiny, low resolution thumbnails. This is inferior to Metashape that allows you to view the full size image in full resolution to pinpoint GCPs. On a recent flight, I used my black and white markers for GCPs but also shot debris on the beach as GCP. Sitescan located the black and white markers but did not locate/incorporate the debris shots.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 21:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-flight-ideas/improve-ground-control-positioning/idi-p/1381929</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeFaries</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-13T21:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Improve ground control positioning</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-flight-ideas/improve-ground-control-positioning/idc-p/1388178#M237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Joe,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you Manually Tag GCPs in Site Scan you can view the image in full resolution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 17:55:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-flight-ideas/improve-ground-control-positioning/idc-p/1388178#M237</guid>
      <dc:creator>PetillionJeff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-28T17:55:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

