<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What Coordinate System is Best? in ArcGIS Field Maps Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/what-coordinate-system-is-best/m-p/1291040#M6076</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;WGS84 would be the safest bet as this is the default for the map and requires less reprojecting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;for z, make sure your feature class is Z-enabled, in the Trimble Mobile Manager App under GNSS settings download the proper Geoid (geoid 18 conus in in continental US) while these values will not `be represented in the FS fields (altitude is always the HAE meters) you can use field calculator or an expression in field maps to call the Z value that DOES get passed from the GPS to the feature.&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Round&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Geometry($feature&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;z&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have experimented with many different FS coordinate systems and they all seem to work fine. had a couple concerns and was sweating&amp;nbsp;pretty hard. the biggest mistake i see is that users can keep the position source as integrated and the profile set to what the DA2 needs and this results in a large shift of features.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 13:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DavidCook2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-19T13:42:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What Coordinate System is Best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/what-coordinate-system-is-best/m-p/1286387#M5924</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using ESRI Field Maps in association with ArcGIS Online hosted features to collect wetland delineation data.&amp;nbsp; I am using an iPhone connected to the Trimble DA2 with Catalyst 60.&amp;nbsp; Was wondering what coordinate system I should be using for the hosted features?&amp;nbsp; Should it be WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere for x,y and WGS 1984 for z?&amp;nbsp; Should it be WGS 1984 all around?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2023 20:37:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/what-coordinate-system-is-best/m-p/1286387#M5924</guid>
      <dc:creator>JustinJohnston</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-05T20:37:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What Coordinate System is Best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/what-coordinate-system-is-best/m-p/1291040#M6076</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;WGS84 would be the safest bet as this is the default for the map and requires less reprojecting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;for z, make sure your feature class is Z-enabled, in the Trimble Mobile Manager App under GNSS settings download the proper Geoid (geoid 18 conus in in continental US) while these values will not `be represented in the FS fields (altitude is always the HAE meters) you can use field calculator or an expression in field maps to call the Z value that DOES get passed from the GPS to the feature.&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Round&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Geometry($feature&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;z&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have experimented with many different FS coordinate systems and they all seem to work fine. had a couple concerns and was sweating&amp;nbsp;pretty hard. the biggest mistake i see is that users can keep the position source as integrated and the profile set to what the DA2 needs and this results in a large shift of features.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2023 13:42:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-questions/what-coordinate-system-is-best/m-p/1291040#M6076</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidCook2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-19T13:42:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

