<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow third part offsets from Emlid in ArcGIS Field Maps Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idi-p/1655574</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I use Emlid RTK GPS receivers with Field Maps, and the one limitation they've had was the ability to do offset shots. The new RS4 Pro has that capability finally using dual cameras. Can we get that option for integration into Field Maps to allow for offsets without a range finder like it's currently set up for?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RemWilson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-10-06T17:29:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow third part offsets from Emlid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idi-p/1655574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I use Emlid RTK GPS receivers with Field Maps, and the one limitation they've had was the ability to do offset shots. The new RS4 Pro has that capability finally using dual cameras. Can we get that option for integration into Field Maps to allow for offsets without a range finder like it's currently set up for?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:29:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idi-p/1655574</guid>
      <dc:creator>RemWilson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-06T17:29:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow third part offsets from Emlid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idc-p/1655596#M2398</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sounds like a great idea&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2025 17:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idc-p/1655596#M2398</guid>
      <dc:creator>TylerJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-06T17:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow third part offsets from Emlid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idc-p/1656124#M2403</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Its not Emlid's limitation, its FM's. FM still doesn't have offset like ArcPad had 20 years back. Expecting Esri to include visual offset for Emlid is a long shot. They might think once Trimble invents it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 04:29:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-field-maps-ideas/allow-third-part-offsets-from-emlid/idc-p/1656124#M2403</guid>
      <dc:creator>Y_Chau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-08T04:29:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

