<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcGIS Explorer Local data poor performance in ArcGIS Explorer Desktop Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564321#M3370</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Mike, appreciate the response.&amp;nbsp; I am going to try out the layer packages and I will report back on the performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Simon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SimonFisher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-16T19:13:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Explorer Local data poor performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564319#M3368</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been noticing poor performance (looks like cpu) in ArcGIS Explorer after adding local data such as shapefiles.&amp;nbsp; It seems very slow to draw even just one shapefile.&amp;nbsp; Performance seems much worse than the same data in ArcMap. Are there any guidelines on what the best local data sources are?&amp;nbsp; shapefile vs. personal gdb? or would layer packages perform any better?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Simon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564319#M3368</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimonFisher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-16T12:43:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Explorer Local data poor performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564320#M3369</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Simon,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The File Geodatabase format offers the best performance for local datasets. For datasets that will be read-only you can also compress the Feature Classes in a File Geodatabase thereby improving performance even further. Using File GDBs also reduces the storage and if you do use the compression reduces the volume significantly (obviously depending on geometry type, unique attributes, etc).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Before compressing though you should confirm that each Feature Class has the optimum spatial index (there's a "Recalculate" button on the properties dialog) plus add an attribute index to any attribute field used for rendering / symbology. Then compress if you don't plan to edit that dataset.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You can also use Layer Packages - internally these use the File Geodatabase format to provide the best performance but also include the rendering information, and are easily shareable via ArcGIS.com too.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mike&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564320#M3369</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelBranscomb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-16T15:16:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Explorer Local data poor performance</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564321#M3370</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Mike, appreciate the response.&amp;nbsp; I am going to try out the layer packages and I will report back on the performance.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Simon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-local-data-poor-performance/m-p/564321#M3370</guid>
      <dc:creator>SimonFisher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-16T19:13:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

