<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcGIS Explorer - Agile or Waterfall? in ArcGIS Explorer Desktop Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-agile-or-waterfall/m-p/328668#M2033</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The last build of the wildly popular ArcGIS Explorer Desktop (AGX) application (build 2500), was released February 12, 2013.&amp;nbsp; Since its release, many users have supplied input to the Forum and technologies have advanced.&amp;nbsp; Just over a year later, we are still wondering when the next build of AGX will be released.&amp;nbsp; Responses to user questions regarding a release timeframe have included:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"The next release of ArcGIS Explorer Desktop will be 10.2 and the timing of future releases will fall in-line with the ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap) releases."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"This will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Explorer desktop. It is just taking longer to get an update out than we had originally planned."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"We are planning to have ArcGIS Explorer desktop ready for release with ArcGIS Next.&amp;nbsp; Q3 at earliest ??"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No disrespect to the hard working members of the development teams, but does Esri's AGX team develop under the Agile Method or Waterfall Method?&amp;nbsp; With releases once a year or longer and no intermediate builds with bug fixes, it appears that development is driven by the Waterfall method, which puzzles me.&amp;nbsp; Scott Morehouse, Sud Menon, Jim McKinney and others gave a talk at last year's User Conference and they described Esri's use of the Agile method for development.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS Online is getting updates every three to four months, which fits with the Agile method.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS for Desktop and Server get patches and service packs throughout the year between major releases.&amp;nbsp; I think that many of us are wondering why AGX is not following a similar Agile path with updates and releases.&amp;nbsp; Are we tacitly being turned away from AGX desktop and steered toward ArcGIS Online for Organizations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JoeFlannery</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-19T14:44:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Explorer - Agile or Waterfall?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-agile-or-waterfall/m-p/328668#M2033</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The last build of the wildly popular ArcGIS Explorer Desktop (AGX) application (build 2500), was released February 12, 2013.&amp;nbsp; Since its release, many users have supplied input to the Forum and technologies have advanced.&amp;nbsp; Just over a year later, we are still wondering when the next build of AGX will be released.&amp;nbsp; Responses to user questions regarding a release timeframe have included:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"The next release of ArcGIS Explorer Desktop will be 10.2 and the timing of future releases will fall in-line with the ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap) releases."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"This will be fixed in the next release of ArcGIS Explorer desktop. It is just taking longer to get an update out than we had originally planned."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"We are planning to have ArcGIS Explorer desktop ready for release with ArcGIS Next.&amp;nbsp; Q3 at earliest ??"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No disrespect to the hard working members of the development teams, but does Esri's AGX team develop under the Agile Method or Waterfall Method?&amp;nbsp; With releases once a year or longer and no intermediate builds with bug fixes, it appears that development is driven by the Waterfall method, which puzzles me.&amp;nbsp; Scott Morehouse, Sud Menon, Jim McKinney and others gave a talk at last year's User Conference and they described Esri's use of the Agile method for development.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS Online is getting updates every three to four months, which fits with the Agile method.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS for Desktop and Server get patches and service packs throughout the year between major releases.&amp;nbsp; I think that many of us are wondering why AGX is not following a similar Agile path with updates and releases.&amp;nbsp; Are we tacitly being turned away from AGX desktop and steered toward ArcGIS Online for Organizations?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:44:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-explorer-desktop-questions/arcgis-explorer-agile-or-waterfall/m-p/328668#M2033</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeFlannery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-19T14:44:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

