<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcGIS Cache directories in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248851#M9607</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my experiences with IT, it is easier to expand an additional drive such as an E-drive than it is to expand the C-drive to account for more storage that is needed as you create more cached mapservices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 12:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-12T12:22:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Cache directories</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248850#M9606</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi I am building our new server and I am wondering if there is any benefit to storing the arcgiscache, arcgisjobs, arcgisinput and arcgissystem locations on another drive on my server? If it matters, I am using a virtual server running Server 2012 R2 and using Server 10.2.2. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 11:51:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248850#M9606</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgePapamihalakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-12T11:51:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Cache directories</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248851#M9607</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From my experiences with IT, it is easier to expand an additional drive such as an E-drive than it is to expand the C-drive to account for more storage that is needed as you create more cached mapservices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 12:22:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248851#M9607</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-12T12:22:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Cache directories</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248852#M9608</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if there is ​an actual advantage performance wise, but to add to what Michael mentioned, IT also tend to lock down the c-drive, for security reasons. So putting those folders on the d-drive or other "local" drive makes it easier to manage, and I have not found any negative performance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; There are still some AGS folders that remain on the c drive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 14:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-cache-directories/m-p/248852#M9608</guid>
      <dc:creator>RebeccaStrauch__GISP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-12T14:09:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

