<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issues with 10.3 Geocoding and confusing 100.0 scores in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13140#M492</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't the USAddress.lot.xml from 10.4.1 be the most current?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DEWright_CA</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-28T18:40:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues with 10.3 Geocoding and confusing 100.0 scores</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13138#M490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a address I am working with; 323 N Fifth Ave, Sequim WA, 98382. Now I use both commercial and internally developed data that goes into a composite geocoder set in a hierarchy based on the quality of said sources; pretty standard stuff.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So how can I get a result returned like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Score: &lt;/EM&gt; 100.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Address: &lt;/EM&gt; 323 NORTH ST, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Loc_name: &lt;/EM&gt; HERE_Points&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Score: &lt;/EM&gt; 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Match_addr: &lt;/EM&gt; 323 NORTH ST, SEQUIM, WA, 98382&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;House: &lt;/EM&gt; 323&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Side: &lt;/EM&gt; L&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;PreDir: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;PreType: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;StreetName: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #e23d39;"&gt;NORTH&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;SufType: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #e23d39;"&gt;ST&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;SufDir: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;City: &lt;/EM&gt; SEQUIM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;State: &lt;/EM&gt; WA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ZIP: &lt;/EM&gt; 98382&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Where the 'NORTH' as the street Name and 'ST' as SufType as swapped and the score of 100.0 is assigned. While further down the composite process I get this return as well:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Score: &lt;/EM&gt; 100.0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Address: &lt;/EM&gt; 323 N 5TH AVE, SEQUIM, WA, 98382 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Loc_name: &lt;/EM&gt; HERE_Streets&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Score: &lt;/EM&gt; 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Match_addr: &lt;/EM&gt; 323 N 5TH AVE, SEQUIM, WA, 98382&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;House: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Side: &lt;/EM&gt; L&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;PreDir: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #e23d39;"&gt;N&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;PreType: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;StreetName: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #e23d39;"&gt;5TH&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;SufType: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;SPAN style="color: #e23d39;"&gt;AVE&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;SufDir: &lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;City: &lt;/EM&gt; SEQUIM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;State: &lt;/EM&gt; WA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;ZIP: &lt;/EM&gt; 98382&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I get a 100.0 score for both of these results in my composite; where obviously the first one swapped the street elements pretty extremely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3241"&gt;Bruce Harold&lt;/A&gt;​ , &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3514"&gt;Agatha Wong&lt;/A&gt;​ or &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3453"&gt;Brad Niemand&lt;/A&gt;​ can give me some insight; this is confusing us.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 17:34:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13138#M490</guid>
      <dc:creator>DEWright_CA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-28T17:34:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with 10.3 Geocoding and confusing 100.0 scores</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13139#M491</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might be something handled better with the latest USA locator styles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a PointAddress quality 323 North St and it looks like scoring isn't handling it ideally in your composite.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is how AGOL does:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/find?text=323%20N%20Fifth%20Ave,%20Sequim%20WA,%2098382&amp;amp;outFields=*&amp;amp;f=pjson" title="http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/find?text=323%20N%20Fifth%20Ave,%20Sequim%20WA,%2098382&amp;amp;outFields=*&amp;amp;f=pjson"&gt;http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/find?text=323%20N%20Fifth%20Ave,%20Sequim%20WA,%20983…&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And candidates:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/findAddressCandidates?&amp;amp;SingleLine=323%20N%20Fifth%20Ave,%20Sequim%20WA,%2098382&amp;amp;outFields=*&amp;amp;f=pjson" title="http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/findAddressCandidates?&amp;amp;SingleLine=323%20N%20Fifth%20Ave,%20Sequim%20WA,%2098382&amp;amp;outFields=*&amp;amp;f=pjson"&gt;http://geocode.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/GeocodeServer/findAddressCandidates?&amp;amp;SingleLine=323%20N%20Fifth%20A…&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13139#M491</guid>
      <dc:creator>BruceHarold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-28T18:21:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with 10.3 Geocoding and confusing 100.0 scores</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13140#M492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't the USAddress.lot.xml from 10.4.1 be the most current?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:40:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13140#M492</guid>
      <dc:creator>DEWright_CA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-28T18:40:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with 10.3 Geocoding and confusing 100.0 scores</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13141#M493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, but in corner scoring cases we may be able to help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/issues-with-10-3-geocoding-and-confusing-100-0/m-p/13141#M493</guid>
      <dc:creator>BruceHarold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-28T19:39:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

