<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Esri Licensing - Can Enterprise Viewer User Types Edit Features Of Secured Services of Unfederated ArcGIS? in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/esri-licensing-can-enterprise-viewer-user-types/m-p/1613038#M42197</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This question is specifically about whether the following scenario would violate Esri's licensing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's say an organization has a full ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3 setup (Portal, Server, Datastore), as well as standalone (unfederated) ArcGIS Server that uses built-in users and role permissions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that feature services from the unfederated ArcGIS Server (UAGS) can be registered in Portal using stored credentials, shared like any other Portal item, and then made available to a web map.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario would viewer user-types be able to edit these feature services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another possible scenario is a custom application that allows users the ability to edit such services via a server-side process that handles the service requests uses stored credentials.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would either or both of the above run afoul of Esri's licensing terms of service?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 23:11:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JonSwoveland</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-08T23:11:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Esri Licensing - Can Enterprise Viewer User Types Edit Features Of Secured Services of Unfederated ArcGIS?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/esri-licensing-can-enterprise-viewer-user-types/m-p/1613038#M42197</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This question is specifically about whether the following scenario would violate Esri's licensing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let's say an organization has a full ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3 setup (Portal, Server, Datastore), as well as standalone (unfederated) ArcGIS Server that uses built-in users and role permissions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that feature services from the unfederated ArcGIS Server (UAGS) can be registered in Portal using stored credentials, shared like any other Portal item, and then made available to a web map.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this scenario would viewer user-types be able to edit these feature services.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another possible scenario is a custom application that allows users the ability to edit such services via a server-side process that handles the service requests uses stored credentials.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would either or both of the above run afoul of Esri's licensing terms of service?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2025 23:11:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/esri-licensing-can-enterprise-viewer-user-types/m-p/1613038#M42197</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonSwoveland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-08T23:11:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

