<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Approaches for Health Checking an ArcGIS Enterprise in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293343#M36082</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's a genuine pattern, yes.&amp;nbsp; But the consultant should also ask if they have any particular concerns that require a deep dive?&amp;nbsp; For example they may know of security weaknesses or geodatabase health problems.&amp;nbsp; There could be specific performance issues, that need further investigation as well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A common topic at the moment is, the cloud, and if the existing environment is fit for migration and best strategies to that.&amp;nbsp; This latter discussion should also consider Kubernetes, if the scale of the current solution aligns.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I normally allow for around 2 weeks, but if further investigation in a specific area is required then that may expand to 3.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 01:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-26T01:36:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Approaches for Health Checking an ArcGIS Enterprise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293342#M36081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've been tasked with looking into approaches to doing an ArcGIS Enterprise Health Check.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My literature review so far suggests that organisations often engage external consultants to review their ArcGIS Enterprise using three steps:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Consultants spend 2-3 days onsite to learn about the current implementation and any concerns with it;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Consultants install monitoring software to obtain baseline information about how the current implementation is performing; and&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Consultants provide a written report to summarize the results of the meetings and monitoring, and to make recommendations for improvements&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have been involved in an&amp;nbsp;ArcGIS Enterprise Health Check, is the approach above what you would recommend, or do you have other advice to offer?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:53:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293342#M36081</guid>
      <dc:creator>GraemeBrowning_Aurizon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T00:53:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Approaches for Health Checking an ArcGIS Enterprise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293343#M36082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's a genuine pattern, yes.&amp;nbsp; But the consultant should also ask if they have any particular concerns that require a deep dive?&amp;nbsp; For example they may know of security weaknesses or geodatabase health problems.&amp;nbsp; There could be specific performance issues, that need further investigation as well.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A common topic at the moment is, the cloud, and if the existing environment is fit for migration and best strategies to that.&amp;nbsp; This latter discussion should also consider Kubernetes, if the scale of the current solution aligns.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I normally allow for around 2 weeks, but if further investigation in a specific area is required then that may expand to 3.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 01:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293343#M36082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T01:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Approaches for Health Checking an ArcGIS Enterprise</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293350#M36083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/596055"&gt;@GraemeBrowning_Aurizon&lt;/a&gt;,&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;FYI, you could use &lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-monitor/overview" target="_self"&gt;ArcGIS Monitor&lt;/A&gt; to help with doing a health check on an ArcGIS Enterprise deployment. ArcGIS Monitor&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;helps optimize your enterprise GIS investment through proactive performance and system health monitoring.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you don't want to review the product page, take a look at the recent release blog: &lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/monitor/administration/next-generation-arcgis-monitor-2023-now-available/" target="_self"&gt;Next Generation ArcGIS Monitor 2023 Now Available!&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 02:42:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/approaches-for-health-checking-an-arcgis/m-p/1293350#M36083</guid>
      <dc:creator>DerekLaw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-26T02:42:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

