<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263027#M35261</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Instances to zero is an often used approach. &amp;nbsp;The service will remain on but will need time to spin up when first requested. &amp;nbsp;If I used it will close down and then the next user needs the spin up time. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it’s an approach, but also a compromise of performance. &amp;nbsp;Given the need to use pro in the future also consider that at 11.x you need to use .Net 6 which means more change. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There’s a few things to consider and some careful planning needed for the road ahead. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:31:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1262907#M35253</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If a service has several SOE enabled, does its ArcSOC process then consume more RAM as compared to having no SOE enabled?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our clients uses ArcGIS Server 10.8.1 and the site has over 150 services. On top of these, each service often has 3-4 SOE enabled. The site crashes frequently due to OS error "out of memory". We suggested to migrate some of the services to a new site, reduce the number of services in each site, and also reduce the min instances of each service (or use Shared Instances). The large number of SOEs is a huge concern too, but there isn't clear documentation about whether SOE causes a higher usage of RAM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any idea?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 07:05:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1262907#M35253</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvelynHsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T07:05:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263003#M35256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;150 services is quite high. &amp;nbsp;Are they all dedicated or are using the sharing model? &amp;nbsp;There are many factors that determine memory usage, without even considering SOEs. &amp;nbsp;Out of interest how much RAM is available on each host?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263003#M35256</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:05:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263006#M35257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Each machine was allocated 32GB RAM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All services were published with ArcMap, currently using dedicated instances.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:11:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263006#M35257</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvelynHsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:11:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263013#M35258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Without doing a full capacity plan, I’d be looking at 48-64 GB, but preferably no more than 100 services per site. &amp;nbsp;Also have a play with this tool: &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.ope.nz/esri/mem_calc_advanced_104" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.ope.nz/esri/mem_calc_advanced_104&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:16:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263013#M35258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:16:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263017#M35259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The other alternative is publishing with pro and shared instances, they really make a massive difference to memory usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;please be aware changes in the code may be required: &amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://developers.arcgis.com/enterprise-sdk/guide/net/develop-extensions-for-shared-instances-net/" target="_blank"&gt;https://developers.arcgis.com/enterprise-sdk/guide/net/develop-extensions-for-shared-instances-net/&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263017#M35259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:26:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263022#M35260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Scott. That's a really useful tool!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We were under the impression that if a service has SOE/SOI, it can't be directly converted to Shared Instances, since the SOE/SOI will need to be re-developed using Pro SDK. This is also why we decided to stay with Dedicated Instances, and maybe try with lowering Min Instances to 0 for those rarely used services.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263022#M35260</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvelynHsu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:26:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Higher RAM usage for services with SOE enabled</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263027#M35261</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Instances to zero is an often used approach. &amp;nbsp;The service will remain on but will need time to spin up when first requested. &amp;nbsp;If I used it will close down and then the next user needs the spin up time. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it’s an approach, but also a compromise of performance. &amp;nbsp;Given the need to use pro in the future also consider that at 11.x you need to use .Net 6 which means more change. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There’s a few things to consider and some careful planning needed for the road ahead. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 14:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/higher-ram-usage-for-services-with-soe-enabled/m-p/1263027#M35261</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Tansley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-01T14:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

