<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hosted feature layers or hosted feature views? in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/hosted-feature-layers-or-hosted-feature-views/m-p/747921#M28364</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I need to create definition queries to represent simple binary, numeric, or text values from a grid index so that I end up with 40-50 individual feature layers to use in a web map:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+ Is it more efficient to share the grid index first as a hosted feature layer then create the individual layers as view definitions, so I have 40-50 hosted views?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+ Or, is more efficient to share 40-50 individual web layers by creating definition queries from ArcMap/ArcPro, so that I end up with 40-50 hosted feature layers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Essentially is there a performance difference between hosted feature layers and hosted feature views? Since I have read in the "Data in ArcGIS" June 2018 white paper that hosted layers are not resource intensive, i.e., a "regular" deployment of Enterprise can easily support many hosted (thousands) layers, is this also true of hosted views?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any guidance.&amp;nbsp; Best, Dixie.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dixie_MDavis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-05-27T11:05:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hosted feature layers or hosted feature views?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/hosted-feature-layers-or-hosted-feature-views/m-p/747921#M28364</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I need to create definition queries to represent simple binary, numeric, or text values from a grid index so that I end up with 40-50 individual feature layers to use in a web map:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+ Is it more efficient to share the grid index first as a hosted feature layer then create the individual layers as view definitions, so I have 40-50 hosted views?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;+ Or, is more efficient to share 40-50 individual web layers by creating definition queries from ArcMap/ArcPro, so that I end up with 40-50 hosted feature layers?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Essentially is there a performance difference between hosted feature layers and hosted feature views? Since I have read in the "Data in ArcGIS" June 2018 white paper that hosted layers are not resource intensive, i.e., a "regular" deployment of Enterprise can easily support many hosted (thousands) layers, is this also true of hosted views?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any guidance.&amp;nbsp; Best, Dixie.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2020 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/hosted-feature-layers-or-hosted-feature-views/m-p/747921#M28364</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dixie_MDavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-27T11:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

