<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcGIS Server 10.1 sp2 in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705494#M27025</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I noticed a huge list of fixes in the 10.2 release here:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://downloads.esri.com/support/downloads/other_/102-IssuesAddressedList.pdf"&gt;http://downloads.esri.com/support/downloads/other_/102-IssuesAddressedList.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Obviously these same fixes are going to be include in the next service pack for 10.1 right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i'm surprised that i didn't catch the 10.1 sp2 release announcement. I'm on the RSS feeds and watch the blogs quite diligently.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ESRI wouldn't force people to go to 10.2 just to get fixes for a product they already have installed (10.1 sp1) right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because many organizations view that '.X' update to be a 'major' release and upgrading to that requires more time and duty than a simple service pack to a product that is already installed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KevinGooss</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-11T20:26:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Server 10.1 sp2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705494#M27025</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I noticed a huge list of fixes in the 10.2 release here:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://downloads.esri.com/support/downloads/other_/102-IssuesAddressedList.pdf"&gt;http://downloads.esri.com/support/downloads/other_/102-IssuesAddressedList.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Obviously these same fixes are going to be include in the next service pack for 10.1 right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i'm surprised that i didn't catch the 10.1 sp2 release announcement. I'm on the RSS feeds and watch the blogs quite diligently.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ESRI wouldn't force people to go to 10.2 just to get fixes for a product they already have installed (10.1 sp1) right?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because many organizations view that '.X' update to be a 'major' release and upgrading to that requires more time and duty than a simple service pack to a product that is already installed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:26:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705494#M27025</guid>
      <dc:creator>KevinGooss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-11T20:26:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Server 10.1 sp2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705495#M27026</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kevin,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This has already been discussed in some length in this thread&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/79232-ArcGIS-10.2"&gt;ArcGIS 10.2&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;and particularily, see this response of an ESRI employee in that thread:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/79232-ArcGIS-10.2?p=287668&amp;amp;viewfull=1#post287668"&gt;http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/79232-ArcGIS-10.2?p=287668&amp;amp;viewfull=1#post287668&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So yes, there is most likely not going to be a 10.1 SP2, and you'll probably be forced to do a full upgrade to 10.2 if you want to take advantage of bug fixes, with the added bonus of some nice new functionality.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anyway, even if there would have been a 10.1 SP2, from a technical point of view, with so many fixes as announced now, it is likely that a plethora of components would have to be replaced during installation of the Service Pack, so as to make the distinction between a simple Service Pack upgrade and a full re-install insignificant...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Marco&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 07:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705495#M27026</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcoBoeringa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-12T07:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Server 10.1 sp2</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705496#M27027</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Extra info ArcGIS 11 support 64bit: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://events.esri.com/uc/QandA/index.cfm?fuseaction=answer&amp;amp;conferenceId=CCAEEE69-1422-2418-7F1D0EB8490B776D&amp;amp;questionId=4806"&gt;http://events.esri.com/uc/QandA/index.cfm?fuseaction=answer&amp;amp;conferenceId=CCAEEE69-1422-2418-7F1D0EB8490B776D&amp;amp;questionId=4806&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/arcgis-server-10-1-sp2/m-p/705496#M27027</guid>
      <dc:creator>nicogis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-12T08:19:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

