<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Amazon Aurora experiances? in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/amazon-aurora-experiances/m-p/572548#M22105</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just found out this morning that EGDB now support amazon aurora. We are currently have a PostgreSQL RDS database at 10.6.1 and I'm planning my 10.8 upgrade soon. Now I'm wondering if I should move to Aurora as part of the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not very experienced with Aurora beyond the tact that it is supposed to be cheaper. Does anyone have any experiences or advice they can share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our current EGDB usage is pretty light, maybe 5 - 10 concurrent connections and &amp;lt; 100 iOPs per hour. It functions more as a read only warehouse through read only feature services, although there are 4 -5 edited feature services. But twice a week it gets hit very hard as the content is refreshed from on prem edit environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So any advice, thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I wish I had seen this yesterday so I could have asked the fine folks at the geodatabase section of the UC expo)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DrewDowling</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-16T17:33:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Aurora experiances?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/amazon-aurora-experiances/m-p/572548#M22105</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just found out this morning that EGDB now support amazon aurora. We are currently have a PostgreSQL RDS database at 10.6.1 and I'm planning my 10.8 upgrade soon. Now I'm wondering if I should move to Aurora as part of the upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not very experienced with Aurora beyond the tact that it is supposed to be cheaper. Does anyone have any experiences or advice they can share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our current EGDB usage is pretty light, maybe 5 - 10 concurrent connections and &amp;lt; 100 iOPs per hour. It functions more as a read only warehouse through read only feature services, although there are 4 -5 edited feature services. But twice a week it gets hit very hard as the content is refreshed from on prem edit environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So any advice, thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(I wish I had seen this yesterday so I could have asked the fine folks at the geodatabase section of the UC expo)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/amazon-aurora-experiances/m-p/572548#M22105</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrewDowling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-07-16T17:33:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

