<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Upgraded ADF application (9.3 to 10.1) issues in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318742#M12192</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The thread is not that old - it is my join date that is 2010.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I did manage to get this issue resolved although I am afraid I cannot recall how. It's possible I didn't do anything and whatever was upsetting AGS at the time resolved itself... &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My application is using some of the NITK components and they were upgraded OK. I have to disable a few functions that didn't seem compatible with upgraded DLLs but fortunately for me they were not being used by my code.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The upgrade from 9.3.1 to 10.1 is possible but I had numerous problems with the core JavaScript (not customised code). I saw bugs within seconds of opening my upgraded application, almost as if no one actually tested the upgrade utility before it was released.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you ask for help with the ADF these days you might get some assistance but only after repeated suggestions to migrate to a new framework e.g. the JS API. These are good suggestions but totally ignore the realities of having developed substantial applications against an old framework and not having budget to re-architect all that functionality. If this applies to you I can only suggest you remain skeptical of each 'next big thing' until it's been proven in the wild, which the ADF never was.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomCohen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-11-22T16:06:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Upgraded ADF application (9.3 to 10.1) issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318740#M12190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I can't figure out which is the best sub-forum for this question (why are there so many?), and I suspect I might be the only person in the whole world attempting to do this, but here goes...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I had an application based on the .NET Web ADF originally built in 9.3. The server is being upgraded to 10.1 so the application needs to move with it (re-architecting is not an option).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The automated upgrade utility was not the smoothest process and I have since fixed a couple of very obvious bugs in the ESRI JavaScript. However there is one problem I can't figure out:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Intermittently, after a full page reload, the map fails to render. The application calls ESRI.ArcGIS.ADF.Web.UI.WebControls.MapHandler.ashx requesting a URL for the new map image. Sometimes that handler returns&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE class="plain" name="code"&gt;{"code":400,"type":"error","errorMessage":"Resource &amp;lt;service name&amp;gt; not found"}&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;DIV style="display:none;"&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The application then requests an image from ESRI.ArcGIS.ADF.Web.MimeImage.ashx passing an ImgID parameter that seems to be randomly made-up - I can't see it in any previous requests and it obviously isn't provided by MapHandler.ashx. The server then responds with a 404. If I reload the application again the same requests are sent with exactly the same parameters (in the example I saw the post-reload request even passed the same 't' parameter which I assume should represent time) and a successful response is returned.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can anyone tell me why my service is reported as unavailable? ArcGIS Server is not logging any errors or warnings.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 22:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318740#M12190</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomCohen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-01T22:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded ADF application (9.3 to 10.1) issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318741#M12191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hola, veo que nadie te ha respondido desde el 2010. En mi caso tengo que migrar 13 aplicaciones entre Webs Desktops y Procesos, de 9.3.1 para ir a 10 o a 10.1.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Por falta de información voy a ir a 10.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Como te fue con tu problema, lograron solucionarlo? ¿Alguien de ESRI, puede animarse a plantear por ejemplo, si la aplicación a migrar utiliza WEB ADF, todas las task (identify/zoom/etc) utilizando parcial class no te funcionaran? ¿Alguien utilizo la librería NITK, allá por el 2007/09, luego lograron migrar a 10.1?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gracias saludos, &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anibal Martinez&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Buenos Aires, Argentina&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318741#M12191</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnibalMmartinez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-22T15:53:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded ADF application (9.3 to 10.1) issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318742#M12192</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The thread is not that old - it is my join date that is 2010.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I did manage to get this issue resolved although I am afraid I cannot recall how. It's possible I didn't do anything and whatever was upsetting AGS at the time resolved itself... &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My application is using some of the NITK components and they were upgraded OK. I have to disable a few functions that didn't seem compatible with upgraded DLLs but fortunately for me they were not being used by my code.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The upgrade from 9.3.1 to 10.1 is possible but I had numerous problems with the core JavaScript (not customised code). I saw bugs within seconds of opening my upgraded application, almost as if no one actually tested the upgrade utility before it was released.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you ask for help with the ADF these days you might get some assistance but only after repeated suggestions to migrate to a new framework e.g. the JS API. These are good suggestions but totally ignore the realities of having developed substantial applications against an old framework and not having budget to re-architect all that functionality. If this applies to you I can only suggest you remain skeptical of each 'next big thing' until it's been proven in the wild, which the ADF never was.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 16:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318742#M12192</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomCohen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-22T16:06:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Upgraded ADF application (9.3 to 10.1) issues</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318743#M12193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Finalmente Tom, te cuento como nos fue, Web ADF y NITK que era lo que mas temíamos, tubo algunos problemas javascript no muy graves, como comentaste y se pudieron solucionar.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;El mayor problema no contemplado, fue que algunos métodos de arcobjet que en 9.3.1 no requerían inicializar licencia en 10 o 10.1 si requiere y el mensaje de error no ayuda a detectarlo y no hay documentación sobre estos cambios.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;También en aplicaciones windows forms tuvimos inconveniente con los procesos en background.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Por ultimo tuvimos un incidente difícil de identificar con Oracle 11G y ArcSDE por un Critical update de Octubre 2014.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tu ayuda fue la única que recibí antes de encarar el proyecto, espero que mi experiencia le sirva a otros,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gracias,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anibal&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/upgraded-adf-application-9-3-to-10-1-issues/m-p/318743#M12193</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnibalMmartinez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-02T17:35:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

