<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Creating tiles for a very long path and correct projection in ArcGIS Enterprise Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/creating-tiles-for-a-very-long-path-and-correct/m-p/273901#M10497</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm pretty new to creating tiled map services, but I'm poking around a bit in ArcMap and have a question. I have a very long path that stretches diagonally across Canada for about 700 miles.&amp;nbsp; Within maybe 50 meters of this path I would like the highest resolution maps (level 19), but progressively less as I zoom out.&amp;nbsp; At the full extent, I suppose level 1 or 2 would suffice.&amp;nbsp; I plan to also expose a feature service for editing simple features including the geometry of the path itself, so ultimately, these tiles will need to be available for disconnected checkout.&amp;nbsp; Now clearly I can't build a cache for all levels 1-19 as that would be terrabytes worth of data, and of course I don't need level 19 detail 100 miles away from my path either.&amp;nbsp; Since the path is so long it's spatial extent is huge.&amp;nbsp; So what is the best way to accomplish this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, a projection question.&amp;nbsp; The path in question (which I have as a lat/long .gpx file) actually spans 3 UTM zones.&amp;nbsp; About 95% of it though is in a single UTM zone. Users in the field will have a hand-held GPS and if they are standing on the path with a correct GPS fix it should show the path obviously pretty much under-foot. Positional accuracy is more important than directional accuracy.&amp;nbsp; What is the best projection to use for this type of tiled map service?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RiverTaig1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-02T15:03:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating tiles for a very long path and correct projection</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/creating-tiles-for-a-very-long-path-and-correct/m-p/273901#M10497</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm pretty new to creating tiled map services, but I'm poking around a bit in ArcMap and have a question. I have a very long path that stretches diagonally across Canada for about 700 miles.&amp;nbsp; Within maybe 50 meters of this path I would like the highest resolution maps (level 19), but progressively less as I zoom out.&amp;nbsp; At the full extent, I suppose level 1 or 2 would suffice.&amp;nbsp; I plan to also expose a feature service for editing simple features including the geometry of the path itself, so ultimately, these tiles will need to be available for disconnected checkout.&amp;nbsp; Now clearly I can't build a cache for all levels 1-19 as that would be terrabytes worth of data, and of course I don't need level 19 detail 100 miles away from my path either.&amp;nbsp; Since the path is so long it's spatial extent is huge.&amp;nbsp; So what is the best way to accomplish this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, a projection question.&amp;nbsp; The path in question (which I have as a lat/long .gpx file) actually spans 3 UTM zones.&amp;nbsp; About 95% of it though is in a single UTM zone. Users in the field will have a hand-held GPS and if they are standing on the path with a correct GPS fix it should show the path obviously pretty much under-foot. Positional accuracy is more important than directional accuracy.&amp;nbsp; What is the best projection to use for this type of tiled map service?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:03:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/creating-tiles-for-a-very-long-path-and-correct/m-p/273901#M10497</guid>
      <dc:creator>RiverTaig1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-02T15:03:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating tiles for a very long path and correct projection</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/creating-tiles-for-a-very-long-path-and-correct/m-p/273902#M10498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the first part of my question can be answered &lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.1/index.html#/Map_caching_based_on_feature_boundaries/01540000044z000000/"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;: You don't have to have a rectangular extent as shown in this help document. I can create a polygon (a very narrow 50 meter wide 700 mile long worm looking thing) and use that. Then probably create progressively fatter worms for less detailed caches.&amp;nbsp; The trick might be then to merge caches together. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another good option for me I think, seems like "Caching on demand".&amp;nbsp; My initial cache would be pretty much empty, and then I could build the cache by simply zooming in super close and slowly panning my way up the path.&amp;nbsp; With each pan a new tile is created on the server in its cache directory so that my users will have immediate access to them.&amp;nbsp; It might be a little slow, but provides the most control. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-questions/creating-tiles-for-a-very-long-path-and-correct/m-p/273902#M10498</guid>
      <dc:creator>RiverTaig1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-02T15:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

