<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea map.getLevel() should return absolute level, not relative level in ArcGIS Enterprise Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/map-getlevel-should-return-absolute-level-not/idi-p/975475</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;In the Javascript API (at leasst)&amp;nbsp;map.getLevel()&amp;nbsp;returns a relative level. &amp;nbsp;For example, if your absemap contains levels 0-18 (i.e google or bing )&amp;nbsp;and you specify LODS&amp;nbsp;in your map creation of levels 9-18, zooming to level 10 will return map.getLevel() = 1 (it is the second level in the map). &amp;nbsp;This is very counterintinutive and does not work well for intergrating with other maps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;would suggest map.getLevel()&amp;nbsp;with optional parameter type: absolute or relative, with absolute as the default.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000brMG --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JeffPace</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-16T13:57:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>map.getLevel() should return absolute level, not relative level</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/map-getlevel-should-return-absolute-level-not/idi-p/975475</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;In the Javascript API (at leasst)&amp;nbsp;map.getLevel()&amp;nbsp;returns a relative level. &amp;nbsp;For example, if your absemap contains levels 0-18 (i.e google or bing )&amp;nbsp;and you specify LODS&amp;nbsp;in your map creation of levels 9-18, zooming to level 10 will return map.getLevel() = 1 (it is the second level in the map). &amp;nbsp;This is very counterintinutive and does not work well for intergrating with other maps.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I&amp;nbsp;would suggest map.getLevel()&amp;nbsp;with optional parameter type: absolute or relative, with absolute as the default.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000brMG --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/map-getlevel-should-return-absolute-level-not/idi-p/975475</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffPace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T13:57:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: map.getLevel() should return absolute level, not relative level</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/map-getlevel-should-return-absolute-level-not/idc-p/975476#M1534</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Tested with Flex API and its Map.Level() method also returns a relative level ID, which is 1.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00a3000000BLDKX --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/map-getlevel-should-return-absolute-level-not/idc-p/975476#M1534</guid>
      <dc:creator>SiqiLi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-16T14:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

