<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Allow Installing more than 21 web-adaptors on single IIS host in ArcGIS Enterprise Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/allow-installing-more-than-21-web-adaptors-on/idi-p/921454</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;We have quite a few ArcGIS Server sites deployed... &amp;nbsp;most of those are accessed through a central, standardized web-adaptor server hosted in IIS. &amp;nbsp;As of version 10.3.0 only 11 web-adapotrs can be installed on a single host. &amp;nbsp;The upgrade to v10.3.1 allowed 21 installations, but we are unable to install the 22nd with the default installation media. &amp;nbsp;The issue is described at the following and there is a work-around that has worked for use for the past ~2 years:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://geonet.esri.com/thread/114296" target="_blank"&gt;https://geonet.esri.com/thread/114296&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Our largest web-adaptor server is sitting with 22 installs running v10.3.1 today, but is growing as our large organization centralizes deployments. &amp;nbsp;I expect to be at 25-30 by years end. &amp;nbsp;There really does not seem to be much of a performance impact having multiple web-adaptors on the same host; The only thing we've noticed is that the collctor workflow with many attachments chews up a lot of system memory on the IIS w3wp.exe process. &amp;nbsp;We've stood up ArcGIS Server sites specifically for the collector workflow and set some limits on memory use on isolated application pools to handle this condition. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This really does benefit us as we can run web statistics from 1 set of logs and configure the 'front door' firewall settings on 1 host (for those deployments that have web-application firewalls with content inspection running). &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Although the work around in place does work, I do have concerns about future support. &amp;nbsp;Please provide the ability to install more web-adaptors on a single host. &amp;nbsp;Maybe cap at 99 rather than 21? &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the consideration. &amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 087E0000000kBh8 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PF1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-18T23:03:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow Installing more than 21 web-adaptors on single IIS host</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/allow-installing-more-than-21-web-adaptors-on/idi-p/921454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;We have quite a few ArcGIS Server sites deployed... &amp;nbsp;most of those are accessed through a central, standardized web-adaptor server hosted in IIS. &amp;nbsp;As of version 10.3.0 only 11 web-adapotrs can be installed on a single host. &amp;nbsp;The upgrade to v10.3.1 allowed 21 installations, but we are unable to install the 22nd with the default installation media. &amp;nbsp;The issue is described at the following and there is a work-around that has worked for use for the past ~2 years:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://geonet.esri.com/thread/114296" target="_blank"&gt;https://geonet.esri.com/thread/114296&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Our largest web-adaptor server is sitting with 22 installs running v10.3.1 today, but is growing as our large organization centralizes deployments. &amp;nbsp;I expect to be at 25-30 by years end. &amp;nbsp;There really does not seem to be much of a performance impact having multiple web-adaptors on the same host; The only thing we've noticed is that the collctor workflow with many attachments chews up a lot of system memory on the IIS w3wp.exe process. &amp;nbsp;We've stood up ArcGIS Server sites specifically for the collector workflow and set some limits on memory use on isolated application pools to handle this condition. &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This really does benefit us as we can run web statistics from 1 set of logs and configure the 'front door' firewall settings on 1 host (for those deployments that have web-application firewalls with content inspection running). &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Although the work around in place does work, I do have concerns about future support. &amp;nbsp;Please provide the ability to install more web-adaptors on a single host. &amp;nbsp;Maybe cap at 99 rather than 21? &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the consideration. &amp;nbsp;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 087E0000000kBh8 --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2016 23:03:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-ideas/allow-installing-more-than-21-web-adaptors-on/idi-p/921454</guid>
      <dc:creator>PF1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-18T23:03:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

