<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why doesn't ArcGIS Earth support layer packages? in ArcGIS Earth Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-earth-questions/why-doesn-t-arcgis-earth-support-layer-packages/m-p/1135323#M870</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Layer packages in ArcGIS Earth gives much sense. Thumbs up&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-01-20T06:55:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why doesn't ArcGIS Earth support layer packages?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-earth-questions/why-doesn-t-arcgis-earth-support-layer-packages/m-p/1135280#M869</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please, someone help me figure this out.&amp;nbsp; ArcGIS Earth has a chance to finally move people away from KML, which is a little like storing your spatial data in Powerpoint.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Esri could do this by supporting their excellent format for storing both vector/raster content and symbology: LAYER PACKAGES.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when you go to drop a .lpkx on ArcGIS Earth, it says "unsupported format."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm getting close to giving up on ArcGIS Earth because years later, it is still behind the (very stale) Google Earth EC Client.&amp;nbsp; It is less flexible (i.e., you can't export a straight KML file from ArcGIS Earth because ArcGIS Earth doesn't know how to reference remote icon links! It has to stash them all in a "files" subfolder and zip them into a KMZ!), and it still doesn't approach parity even in basic symbology.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P data-unlink="true"&gt;I just got done writing a geoprocessing tool to "Esrify" KML output from Google Earth (e.g., remap icon symbology/styles, etc) only to find for example that the icon &amp;lt;href&amp;gt; won't understand anything remote (https) or local (file:).&amp;nbsp; Probably, I shouldn't have to do this anyhow.&amp;nbsp; It seems to make no sense when Esri has a perfectly great storage format which could free us all from KML.&amp;nbsp; So what is the deal?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 02:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-earth-questions/why-doesn-t-arcgis-earth-support-layer-packages/m-p/1135280#M869</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricEagle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T02:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why doesn't ArcGIS Earth support layer packages?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-earth-questions/why-doesn-t-arcgis-earth-support-layer-packages/m-p/1135323#M870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Layer packages in ArcGIS Earth gives much sense. Thumbs up&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2022 06:55:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-earth-questions/why-doesn-t-arcgis-earth-support-layer-packages/m-p/1135323#M870</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-01-20T06:55:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

