<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Custom geoid in d2m? in ArcGIS Drone2Map Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258249#M561</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total d2m newbie here, and have just got same data related to a supportcase (Norwegian distributor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My client has GCP's which are surveyed by professional RTK and corrected for the (quasi)geoid which is the basis for the national height system (NN2000). Horisontal reference is EPSG:2583x (x = 2 or 3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From one EXIF I can see lat/longs (DMMSS.ss) and an AltitudeRef= SeaLevel and an altitude in meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far so good, but what to do with vertical settings in d2m:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the geoids available, none are the correct for my case. Can I make a custom geoid? (I have a textfile with the datapoints for the geoidmodel&amp;nbsp;for NN2000)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;my initial idea was to drop geoid settings and just set a constant height. The geoid undulation is probably non-existing in his small projects (constant is probably good enough. Would that still provide good results?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is the altitude of the frames a problem when there are GCP's at all? would believe the GCP's would tie the model to ground and not at some "random" height given by the EXIF's&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Might even be some of you are willing to share some experiences &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pål Herman&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-20T16:16:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Custom geoid in d2m?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258249#M561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total d2m newbie here, and have just got same data related to a supportcase (Norwegian distributor).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My client has GCP's which are surveyed by professional RTK and corrected for the (quasi)geoid which is the basis for the national height system (NN2000). Horisontal reference is EPSG:2583x (x = 2 or 3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From one EXIF I can see lat/longs (DMMSS.ss) and an AltitudeRef= SeaLevel and an altitude in meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So far so good, but what to do with vertical settings in d2m:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;the geoids available, none are the correct for my case. Can I make a custom geoid? (I have a textfile with the datapoints for the geoidmodel&amp;nbsp;for NN2000)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;my initial idea was to drop geoid settings and just set a constant height. The geoid undulation is probably non-existing in his small projects (constant is probably good enough. Would that still provide good results?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is the altitude of the frames a problem when there are GCP's at all? would believe the GCP's would tie the model to ground and not at some "random" height given by the EXIF's&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Might even be some of you are willing to share some experiences &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pål Herman&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:16:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258249#M561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-20T16:16:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Custom geoid in d2m?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258250#M562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pål&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Drone2Map 2.0 (coming this summer) will have more datum support.&amp;nbsp; Until then,&amp;nbsp;you can simply use a constant elevation value, but this is only used for the initial estimation of scale/resolution.&amp;nbsp; If you apply GCPs, they define the final height values for 3D products.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cody B&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 04:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258250#M562</guid>
      <dc:creator>CodyBenkelman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-27T04:51:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Custom geoid in d2m?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258251#M563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Cody. Got it going with ellipsoidal height+constant for the camerapositions (and of course also with EGMxx as a choise).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the initial processing and connecting the GCPs is the solution updated, or is it time for a new estimation with the improved initial POS values?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pål Herman&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 07:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/custom-geoid-in-d2m/m-p/258251#M563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pål_Herman_Sund</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-27T07:13:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

