<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551922#M820</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All enhancements are logged through the bug tracking system.&amp;nbsp; The check is working as designed in regards to validating the entire topology.&amp;nbsp; We liked your idea, but are not sure if it is possible.&amp;nbsp; We will look into it for a future release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-15T15:15:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551916#M814</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have a Cadastral Topology with 17 topology rules and it has 5 participating feature classes for the whole County.&amp;nbsp; Each feature class contains between 24,000 to 2.3 million features.&amp;nbsp; Every year I need to run and extract errors from just two of those rules ???AOI must not overlap??? and ???AOI must not have gaps??? for the whole County.&amp;nbsp; In the past, I would export the AOI layer to a new file geodatabase, create a new topology with just those two rules, validate and I would have my list of errors.&amp;nbsp; I also use the ExportErrors.dll to create a new ???error??? feature class to give to our editors for clean-up.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We want to know if Data Reviewer can help us so that I do not have to keep exporting the AOI and working off of the main database. I am currently looking at using the Data Reviewer ???Topology Rules Check??? on a test database that has the 17 topology rules implemented. Everything seemed to be going well and it seemed like what I wanted, but then I found out that I needed to validate my area before I ran the check.&amp;nbsp; I enabled the ???validate topology??? check box, but it doesn???t seem to validate just the two rules that I specified, but it would validate the whole topology, meaning all the 17 rules. (*Note, ArcMap froze when I ran the check).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I feel like I am back at square one.&amp;nbsp; I would like to get all the County-wide errors associated to only those two rules, but I want to avoid validating the whole County to do so, because trust me, it will take a long, long time???&amp;nbsp; It would also be nice to run this process using Data Reviewer so that we can keep track of editing and the QA/QC of these errors.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are your suggestions and are any of these needs an enhancement request?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551916#M814</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArcGISUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-09T19:27:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551917#M815</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For "AOI Must Not Overlap" I am thinking the "Geometry on Geometry Check (Overlap)" might work well.&amp;nbsp; I need to test this out.&amp;nbsp; I am still open on thoughts and suggestions though. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 19:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551917#M815</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArcGISUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-09T19:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551918#M816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for the suggestion, Following enhancement has been logged for this request:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Bug ID : 8308&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Title : "Validate Topology" option should honor the Topology rules selection in the check&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:32:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551918#M816</guid>
      <dc:creator>KumarBhardwaj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-10T19:32:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551919#M817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Have you tried the Polygon Overlap\Gap is Sliver check?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This check will look for both overlaps and gaps with a single polygon layer or between two.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It has optional parameters to find only those overlaps and gaps that are long and thin or only those smaller than a specified size.&amp;nbsp; However if you leave the Thinness Ratio set to 1 and the Maximum Polygon Area set to 0 Meters, the check will find any overlaps and gaps regardless of size.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551919#M817</guid>
      <dc:creator>AmberBethell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-11T14:55:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551920#M818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Have you tried the Polygon Overlap\Gap is Sliver check?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This check will look for both overlaps and gaps with a single polygon layer or between two.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; It has optional parameters to find only those overlaps and gaps that are long and thin or only those smaller than a specified size.&amp;nbsp; However if you leave the Thinness Ratio set to 1 and the Maximum Polygon Area set to 0 Meters, the check will find any overlaps and gaps regardless of size.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello Amber,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes we are also looking at that rule, but the check returns some errors in areas that do not really have errors.&amp;nbsp; We set the thickness/thinness ratio to 0.1. Please see my colleague's post here: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/25361-Gap-Sliver"&gt;http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/25361-Gap-Sliver&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; It is the thread underneath this one (as of 03/14/11) and it seems like there is a bug associated with this check as well.&amp;nbsp; We would like to use this check, but it seems like we are getting more invalid results than valid ones.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551920#M818</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArcGISUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T13:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551921#M819</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Thank you for the suggestion, Following enhancement has been logged for this request:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bug ID : 8308&lt;BR /&gt;Title : "Validate Topology" option should honor the Topology rules selection in the check&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello Kumar,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for your response.&amp;nbsp; When you logged this in as a bug instead of an enhancement request, does this mean that the &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Topology Rules Check&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; is supposed to honor/validate &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;only&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; the topology rules that were checked on by the user?&amp;nbsp; I am just curious.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for your help!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;GR&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551921#M819</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArcGISUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-14T13:37:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551922#M820</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;All enhancements are logged through the bug tracking system.&amp;nbsp; The check is working as designed in regards to validating the entire topology.&amp;nbsp; We liked your idea, but are not sure if it is possible.&amp;nbsp; We will look into it for a future release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551922#M820</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T15:15:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Isolating rules: Topology Rules Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551923#M821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;All enhancements are logged through the bug tracking system.&amp;nbsp; The check is working as designed in regards to validating the entire topology.&amp;nbsp; We liked your idea, but are not sure if it is possible.&amp;nbsp; We will look into it for a future release.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for clarifying Michelle!&amp;nbsp; Thanks and I also look forward to an enhancement.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 15:47:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/isolating-rules-topology-rules-check/m-p/551923#M821</guid>
      <dc:creator>ArcGISUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-15T15:47:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

