<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Validating Relationships in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402179#M616</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;The Verify Cardinality option is basically for 1:1 relationship types.&amp;nbsp; It will report errors when a&amp;nbsp; feature has more than one record related to it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Verify Cardinality Rules option is based on the advance relationship properties that a user can define in the relationship class.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for your quick response.&amp;nbsp; Thats pretty cool, so it sounds like then less checks to process, but if we go the way I am planning at close of role that the 1:1 check will work nicely with our Parcel Schema 4.0 release, which is looking to have a lot of 1:1.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-10T21:16:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Validating Relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402177#M614</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What is the difference between Verify Cardinality and Verify Relationship Rules, especially since the doc makes it sound like I can run the Rules check in place of the other checks?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:28:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402177#M614</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T17:28:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validating Relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402178#M615</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Verify Cardinality option is basically for 1:1 relationship types.&amp;nbsp; It will report errors when a&amp;nbsp; feature has more than one record related to it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Verify Cardinality Rules option is based on the advance relationship properties that a user can define in the relationship class.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:54:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402178#M615</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T20:54:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Validating Relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402179#M616</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;The Verify Cardinality option is basically for 1:1 relationship types.&amp;nbsp; It will report errors when a&amp;nbsp; feature has more than one record related to it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Verify Cardinality Rules option is based on the advance relationship properties that a user can define in the relationship class.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you for your quick response.&amp;nbsp; Thats pretty cool, so it sounds like then less checks to process, but if we go the way I am planning at close of role that the 1:1 check will work nicely with our Parcel Schema 4.0 release, which is looking to have a lot of 1:1.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/validating-relationships/m-p/402179#M616</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T21:16:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

