<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1 in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295591#M462</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have some problems with Version 10.4.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Batch Jobs, created on 10.2, are very slow on 10.4.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The test on 10.4.1 run 60 minutes but on 10.2 only 6 minutes with the same BatchJob File&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;It's necessary&lt;/SPAN&gt; to create new BatchJob Files to fix these problem?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shaase</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-02-03T09:48:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295591#M462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everybody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we have some problems with Version 10.4.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our Batch Jobs, created on 10.2, are very slow on 10.4.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The test on 10.4.1 run 60 minutes but on 10.2 only 6 minutes with the same BatchJob File&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="en"&gt;It's necessary&lt;/SPAN&gt; to create new BatchJob Files to fix these problem?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 09:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295591#M462</guid>
      <dc:creator>shaase</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-03T09:48:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295592#M463</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stefan: I don't know the answer to your question.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if I were in your shoes, I would take the slowest job and recreate it and see if the speed improves.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd also look my indexes, compression, etc... to make sure it's not a database issue slowing things down.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2017 23:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295592#M463</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaulDavidson1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-10T23:43:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295593#M464</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm seeing similar using Data Reviewer against versioned SDE... when only evaluating changed features (known to be slow to begin with). &amp;nbsp;I'm using the same database &amp;amp; edit version and same .RBJ file in both 10.3.1 and 10.4.1 tests. &amp;nbsp;I've broken the RBJ into 4 pieces (by feature class) and typically the largest feature class review&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;fails&lt;/EM&gt; with a .NET error or ArcMap crashes (1 edited record out of 1.7 million total features). &amp;nbsp;The other feature classes are about 1,288 records / 48845 records / 98408 records and they complete in 10.3.1 in about half the time it takes on 10.4.1. &amp;nbsp;We'll probably start a ticket with support on this, but given the shift in ESRI's development emphasis to ArcGIS Pro I'm not optimistic in getting a fix - hopefully its a known issue and resolved in 10.5 I guess. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 22:27:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295593#M464</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-24T22:27:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295594#M465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;New Data Reviewer patch out: &amp;nbsp;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://support.esri.com/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-4-1#downloads?id=7488" title="http://support.esri.com/Products/Desktop/arcgis-desktop/arcmap/10-4-1#downloads?id=7488"&gt;Esri Support 10.4.1&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;...could be promising?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;H6 style="color: #4c4c4c; background-color: #ffffff; font-weight: 300; font-size: 1.69949rem; margin: 0px 0px 0.775rem;"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 22px;"&gt;Enhancements and Issues Addressed&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-weight: 500;"&gt;Desktop and Server&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL style="color: #4c4c4c; background-color: #ffffff; font-size: 0.9375rem; margin-left: 0.775rem; margin-bottom: 0.775rem;"&gt;&lt;LI style="color: #595959; font-weight: 300; font-size: 0.9375rem; margin: 0.3875rem 0px 0.3875rem 1.5rem;"&gt;TFS97746 Improve performance when running check on Changed Features Only.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 19:35:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295594#M465</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-13T19:35:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295595#M466</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Much faster! &amp;nbsp;If you have Data Reviewer installed as part of the Mapping &amp;amp; Charting solution, search for that patch instead (not the one I linked above), it contains the same fix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A couple of sample results using two test&amp;nbsp;versions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.4.1 = 49min&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.4.1 with patch =2min 10sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.3.1 = 21min 30sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.4.1 = 1hr 4min 33sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;10.4.1 with patch = 3min 52sec&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/grin.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295595#M466</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveSalas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-28T18:29:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295596#M467</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't speak to 10.4 as we are at 10.3.1 for production, but in our recent testing and implementation of versioned editing using data reviewer for QA, we noticed that installing &lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/download/7448"&gt;the 10.3.1 Data Reviewer patch&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;(link is patch 7, we are at patch 5) resulted in a potential 50% speed increase over the base installation. &amp;nbsp;I'm not sure how many of these improvements are in 10.4, probably most/all of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, be aware that the configuration of data reviewer is critical to performance. &amp;nbsp;At one point we were versioning the internal DR tables themselves (as recommended in the documentation) but this caused extra slow downs and database headaches. &amp;nbsp;We are also using operating system authentication with editor tracking to manage privileges and record an audit trail of changes, some ways of doing this are more efficient than others.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;'Suboptimal' &amp;nbsp;misconfiguration, stack of technologies or check definitions can add delays at every level of the process, leading to extremely frustrating performance. &amp;nbsp;(e.g. Vertex duplication check = extreme thrashing) I believe we have gone from doing whole of dataset QA that took tens of hours in R&amp;amp;D to tens of minutes in production while also doubling the number of checks done.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 06:17:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295596#M467</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewQuee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-21T06:17:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DataReviewer Speed with 10.4.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295597#M468</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Follow-up to above, here is the response from Esri AU support to specific questions I asked.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive_macro_quote jive-quote jive_text_macro"&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt;"&gt;Thank you for contacting Esri Australia - Technical Support. My name is A. and I will be assisting with your case. Below are responses to your questions.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1) Are there fixes in later versions/patches of Data Reviewer that are not available to 10.3.1?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; Yes each update of ArcGIS Desktop, will include fixes to bugs identified in earlier versions. &amp;nbsp;Below is an overview of bugs that have been address after 10.3.1.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;ArcGIS Desktop 10.4 &amp;amp; 10.4.1:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt;"&gt;BUG-000083979, BUG-000087652, BUG-000090826, BUG-000092615, NIM103890, NIM104780, TFS81021, TFS68388, TFS81362, TFS81392, TFS81397, TFS813969.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;ArcGIS Desktop 10.5 and 10.5.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BUG-000104583, TFS91111, TFS92797, TFS95294, TFS95471, TFS95786, TFS97213, TFS98461.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;They can also be source online &lt;A href="http://support.esri.com/en/Products/Desktop/data-and-workflows-extensions/arcgis-data-reviewer/10-4-1#downloads?id=7488"&gt;here.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt;2) If there are subsequent fixes such as TFS100368 for Data Reviewer that are not available at 10.3.1, is there a plan to do this?&amp;nbsp; (i.e. future patch 8 and so forth)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; No, Esri typically will provide bug fixes for the current version of ArcGIS Desktop. If a bug has been identified at a particular version and is version specific, for example only occurs at 10.3.1, Esri may address fixing the bug at the version it is occurring.&amp;nbsp;This particular bug TFS100368 impacted a number of customers, Esri released a patch specific to address this error and another bug at 10.5. The next release of ArcGIS Desktop - 10.5.1 will automatically include the fixes for bug identified in previous versions. Esri doesn't generally release a patch for older version of ArcGIS Desktop if a bug has been addressed in a newer release.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3) Please confirm whether or not “cumulative maintenance patch for ArcGIS Data Reviewer 10.5” includes&amp;nbsp;all&amp;nbsp;fixes for&amp;nbsp;all&amp;nbsp;versions of ArcGIS Data Reviewer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; Yes, installing ArcGIS Desktop 10.5, then the cumulative maintenance patch for ArcGIS Data Reviewer 10.5 will address all bugs fixed in previous versions. (10.4.1, 10.4).&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; Kind regards,&lt;BR /&gt; A.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2017 05:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/datareviewer-speed-with-10-4-1/m-p/295597#M468</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndrewQuee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-15T05:09:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

