<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Relationship Class Check in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88757#M143</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What do you mean by even?&amp;nbsp; Oops, sorry about that, needed a comma I think on your part between even and if.&amp;nbsp; lol&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-24T22:12:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship Class Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88755#M141</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So, I have setup a batch file for relationship classes, and run the batch check on current extent, what is the expected behavior of the related tables, it seems like it would check the geometry in the extent and only process the extent geometries in how they are related to the tables records of the related table that falls inside of the extent of the extent feature class.&amp;nbsp; It seems like the true behavior is checking all the records, which is not what I am expecting.&amp;nbsp; 10 SP 1.&amp;nbsp; This is a batch check.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88755#M141</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-11T00:16:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Relationship Class Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88756#M142</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have tested relationships check with the sample data on Production Mapping 10 SP2 with individual and batch mode, related records are considered even if they fall outside of the current extent. This behavior remains same in case of relationship between feature class and a table.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 23:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88756#M142</guid>
      <dc:creator>KumarBhardwaj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-23T23:48:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Relationship Class Check</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88757#M143</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What do you mean by even?&amp;nbsp; Oops, sorry about that, needed a comma I think on your part between even and if.&amp;nbsp; lol&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 22:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/relationship-class-check/m-p/88757#M143</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-24T22:12:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

