<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro vs Server in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/data-reviewer-for-arcgis-pro-vs-server/m-p/1250551#M1254</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;question from a customer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is required to take full advantage of data reviewer (attribute rules) in Pro?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on these articles...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/geodatabases/overview/evaluate-attribute-rules.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Evaluate attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/geodatabases/overview/share-datasets-with-attribute-rules.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_350657B6EC564DF3ACAF62A10C60C5FB" target="_blank"&gt;Share datasets with attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you confirm that we are interpreting this correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Immediate evaluation (immediate calculation rules and constraint rules) will work in ArcGIS Pro with traditional and branch versioning.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Deferred evaluation (batch calculation rules and validation rules) must be run from a feature service with the validation capability when using an enterprise geodatabase (which we are).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To publish a feature service with validation capability, the feature class must use branch versioning and the ArcGIS Server must have a Data Reviewer license.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to sum it up, in order to fully utilize attribute rules we have to use branch versioning and have a Data Reviewer for Server license. Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any assistance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 20:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LauraPhoebus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-01-23T20:27:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro vs Server</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/data-reviewer-for-arcgis-pro-vs-server/m-p/1250551#M1254</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;question from a customer:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is required to take full advantage of data reviewer (attribute rules) in Pro?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on these articles...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/geodatabases/overview/evaluate-attribute-rules.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Evaluate attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/geodatabases/overview/share-datasets-with-attribute-rules.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_350657B6EC564DF3ACAF62A10C60C5FB" target="_blank"&gt;Share datasets with attribute rules—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you confirm that we are interpreting this correctly?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Immediate evaluation (immediate calculation rules and constraint rules) will work in ArcGIS Pro with traditional and branch versioning.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Deferred evaluation (batch calculation rules and validation rules) must be run from a feature service with the validation capability when using an enterprise geodatabase (which we are).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;To publish a feature service with validation capability, the feature class must use branch versioning and the ArcGIS Server must have a Data Reviewer license.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;So to sum it up, in order to fully utilize attribute rules we have to use branch versioning and have a Data Reviewer for Server license. Is that correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any assistance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 20:27:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/data-reviewer-for-arcgis-pro-vs-server/m-p/1250551#M1254</guid>
      <dc:creator>LauraPhoebus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-23T20:27:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data Reviewer for ArcGIS Pro vs Server</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/data-reviewer-for-arcgis-pro-vs-server/m-p/1251537#M1256</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/561526"&gt;@LauraPhoebus&lt;/a&gt;This is a great question!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regarding licensing, the &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/validating-data/methods-to-implement-automated-validation.htm" target="_self"&gt;Methods to implement automated review&lt;/A&gt; topic is getting an update in the next release to address licensing requirements for Reviewer-based validation attribute rules.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a preview of this update:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consider the following licensing requirements when implementing Reviewer-based attribute rule workflows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Data Reviewer&lt;/SPAN&gt; license for &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;ArcGIS Pro&lt;/SPAN&gt; and an &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;ArcGIS Pro&lt;/SPAN&gt; Standard or Advanced license are both required to create or modify a Reviewer-based attribute rule.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Data Reviewer&lt;/SPAN&gt; license for &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;ArcGIS Pro&lt;/SPAN&gt; and an &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;ArcGIS Pro&lt;/SPAN&gt; Standard or Advanced license are both required to evaluate a Reviewer-based validation attribute rule in a file or mobile geodatabase.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;A &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Data Reviewer&lt;/SPAN&gt; license for &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Enterprise&lt;/SPAN&gt; and an &lt;SPAN class=""&gt;ArcGIS Server&lt;/SPAN&gt; Standard or Advanced license are both required to evaluate a Reviewer-based validation attribute rule in a branch versioned enterprise geodatabase.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this update provides clarity around the licensing requirements.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 19:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/data-reviewer-for-arcgis-pro-vs-server/m-p/1251537#M1256</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayCary</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-25T19:48:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

