<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Simple vs Non Simple in ArcGIS Data Reviewer Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66561#M111</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BTW - at 10 SP3, we now capture non-simple geometries as feature records instead of row records.&amp;nbsp; So you'll be able to double-click on the record in the Reviewer table and be taken directly to that feature.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-12T20:11:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66553#M103</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When is a Parcel polygon a Non Simple Geometry?&amp;nbsp; I recently ran the invalid Check for our parcel layer and it came up with 2 problem polygons that were listed as non simple polygons.&amp;nbsp; Not sure why that would be the case, though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66553#M103</guid>
      <dc:creator>BartHound</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T21:00:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66554#M104</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;A feature is considered Not Simple when its geometry is topologically incorrect. Please see the following link regarding ITopologicalOperator.Simplify Method:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/sdk/10.0/arcobjects_cpp/componenthelp/index.html#/Simplify_Method/000w000003w0000000/"&gt;http://help.arcgis.com/en/sdk/10.0/arcobjects_cpp/componenthelp/index.html#/Simplify_Method/000w000003w0000000/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What software was used to capture the parcel layer?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Have you run the Check Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Have you run the Repair Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66554#M104</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanHopkins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-22T16:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66555#M105</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;A feature is considered Not Simple when its geometry is topologically incorrect. Please see the following link regarding ITopologicalOperator.Simplify Method:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/sdk/10.0/arcobjects_cpp/componenthelp/index.html#/Simplify_Method/000w000003w0000000/"&gt;http://help.arcgis.com/en/sdk/10.0/arcobjects_cpp/componenthelp/index.html#/Simplify_Method/000w000003w0000000/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What software was used to capture the parcel layer?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you run the Check Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you run the Repair Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I will chime in here for Bart, since he is home sick, the data was input via COGO, it may have been Workstation for these two polygons.&amp;nbsp; As far as I know both of these tools were not run on the data, so thank you we will investigate these further with these two tools.&amp;nbsp; I too, have seen some non simple lines, but they make sense, in that they are typically lines that need exploding, and the polys that I have seen were for Books/Pages, and one can clearly see where the issues are, so I will need to recheck with Bart when he makes it in, hopefully later this week.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks again Dan for your assistance in this matter.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:27:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66555#M105</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-25T23:27:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66556#M106</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What software was used to capture the parcel layer?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you run the Check Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you run the Repair Geometry geoprocessing tool? What happens?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Workstation ArcInfo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Repair and Check do not work with SDE Data Layers.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66556#M106</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T21:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66557#M107</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The problem could potentially be that there are some vertices that are within the database tolerance.&amp;nbsp; You can investigate those features in the Sketch Properties in Edit mode.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:36:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66557#M107</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T22:36:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66558#M108</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are seeing non simple for our Parcel Lines show up as rows only with no associated geometry feature, very strange...&amp;nbsp; Will continue investigating.&amp;nbsp; Looking forward to SP1.&amp;nbsp; If you can give Daryl a pat on the back for me.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66558#M108</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-10T23:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66559#M109</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;All&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; invalid geometry errors are captured as ROW errors.&amp;nbsp; That's why you do not see a Reviewer geometry associated to the error record.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66559#M109</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-11T15:26:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66560#M110</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;All&lt;/STRONG&gt; invalid geometry errors are captured as ROW errors.&amp;nbsp; That's why you do not see a Reviewer geometry associated to the error record.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I did not realize that all invalids were captured this way.&amp;nbsp; Will need to re inspect my editors work.&amp;nbsp; Thank you Michelle.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66560#M110</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-11T15:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66561#M111</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;BTW - at 10 SP3, we now capture non-simple geometries as feature records instead of row records.&amp;nbsp; So you'll be able to double-click on the record in the Reviewer table and be taken directly to that feature.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:11:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66561#M111</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-12T20:11:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66562#M112</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How i can auto repair it? (Not use&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Sketch Properties in Edit mode). Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:01:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66562#M112</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhuNguyen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-17T03:01:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66563#M113</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you checked out the &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/data-management-toolbox/repair-geometry.htm"&gt;Repair Geometry&lt;/A&gt; GP tool?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66563#M113</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-30T00:35:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66564#M114</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Michelle,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you know if there is a way to repair geometry and address "bad geometry"&amp;nbsp; issues in SDE environment?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anastasiya&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 23:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66564#M114</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnastasiyaGrecu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-20T23:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66565#M115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately, the &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/data-management-toolbox/repair-geometry.htm"&gt;Repair Geometry&lt;/A&gt; geoprocessing tool does not work on enterprise geodatabases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you look at what that tool does, you could probably find other tools to do what it's doing.&amp;nbsp; For example, some of the more common geometry issues that I come across are NULL geometries.&amp;nbsp; You can use &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/data-management-toolbox/select-layer-by-attribute.htm"&gt;Select By Attribute&lt;/A&gt; to select where the Shape_Area or Shape_Length is NULL or 0 and then &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/data-management-toolbox/delete-features.htm"&gt;Delete &lt;/A&gt;those features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another is polylines with duplicate vertices.&amp;nbsp; You can use &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/editing-toolbox/generalize.htm"&gt;Generalize&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;or &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/cartography-toolbox/simplify-line.htm"&gt;Simplify Line&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;to remove excess vertices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good Luck!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;michellej.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66565#M115</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichelleJohnson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T23:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simple vs Non Simple</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66566#M116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you identify the bad geometry?&amp;nbsp; Then select just those features and export out to a file gdb and see if you can repair it there and see what it does to your geometry.&amp;nbsp; Then you might be able to load the repaired features back into SDE after you deleted the bad geometric features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 23:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-data-reviewer-questions/simple-vs-non-simple/m-p/66566#M116</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T23:10:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

