<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Community Analyst and Census Data don't jibe in ArcGIS Community Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-community-analyst-questions/community-analyst-and-census-data-don-t-jibe/m-p/225722#M61</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there - I am working on a comprehensive plan for Laurel, Delaware.&amp;nbsp; Using data for Laurel Town from both the 2010-2014 American Community Survey and Community Analyst/Tapestry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The racial breakdowns and Tapestry Segments do not match at all between Community Analyst and the Census site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CA says the town is 59.49% white and 29.61% black and that the dominant Tapestry segments are Heartland Communities (49%) and Rustbelt Traditions (34%) - both white ethnically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACS says the town is 42.5 percent white and 42.6 percent black.&amp;nbsp; Which means the dominant Tapestry segments should be something else. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since as a sole proprietor I am paying a lot for Community Analyst, I was wondering where the pretty serious discrepancy could come from. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lee_AnnWalling</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-04-12T15:35:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Community Analyst and Census Data don't jibe</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-community-analyst-questions/community-analyst-and-census-data-don-t-jibe/m-p/225722#M61</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there - I am working on a comprehensive plan for Laurel, Delaware.&amp;nbsp; Using data for Laurel Town from both the 2010-2014 American Community Survey and Community Analyst/Tapestry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The racial breakdowns and Tapestry Segments do not match at all between Community Analyst and the Census site.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CA says the town is 59.49% white and 29.61% black and that the dominant Tapestry segments are Heartland Communities (49%) and Rustbelt Traditions (34%) - both white ethnically.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ACS says the town is 42.5 percent white and 42.6 percent black.&amp;nbsp; Which means the dominant Tapestry segments should be something else. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since as a sole proprietor I am paying a lot for Community Analyst, I was wondering where the pretty serious discrepancy could come from. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 15:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-community-analyst-questions/community-analyst-and-census-data-don-t-jibe/m-p/225722#M61</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lee_AnnWalling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-04-12T15:35:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

