<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple feature classes related to a sigle table in ArcGIS Collector Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/multiple-feature-classes-related-to-a-sigle-table/m-p/379555#M6532</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a feature service in which multiple feature layers are related to the same, single table (one-to-many relationship). My brief test result shows that this works on Collector even for offline data collection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Point layer: Related to table A (one-to-many)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Line Layer: Related to table A (one-to-many)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since only cardinality not supported on Collector is many:many, I think my database schema should work fine as long as the primary key values are unique.&amp;nbsp; Am I correct on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AhjungKim4</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-26T16:18:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple feature classes related to a sigle table</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/multiple-feature-classes-related-to-a-sigle-table/m-p/379555#M6532</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a feature service in which multiple feature layers are related to the same, single table (one-to-many relationship). My brief test result shows that this works on Collector even for offline data collection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Point layer: Related to table A (one-to-many)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Line Layer: Related to table A (one-to-many)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since only cardinality not supported on Collector is many:many, I think my database schema should work fine as long as the primary key values are unique.&amp;nbsp; Am I correct on this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2015 16:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/multiple-feature-classes-related-to-a-sigle-table/m-p/379555#M6532</guid>
      <dc:creator>AhjungKim4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-26T16:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

