<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Looking for ideas on designing a field data collection workflow  in ArcGIS Collector Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/looking-for-ideas-on-designing-a-field-data/m-p/655000#M11289</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We recently purchased new high-accuracy GPS units that integrate very well with Collector. I am trying to figure out what the best option would be for setting up the data collection layer(s). We have Server so most likely I would be hosting the layers internally and not in ArcGIS Online, although I haven't ruled that option out. We manage three different systems (water, sewer and storm) so that's a lot of assets that need to be collected. Most often we would be collecting points either for as-builts (so the more attributes we can collect in the filed the faster we can get the as-builts done); to update the XYZ of assets we already have in our system; or for planning a reconstruction project.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two options that I've come up with so far are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1. Create one feature class for all the points and use subtypes and domains to control the drop-down lists. If I set the subtype based on my system (water, sewer, storm) then I can better control the type of assets and attribute values that would be available when a new record is collected.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;2. Create separate feature classes for each asset. I would set these layers up to have the same schema as my existing feature classes in my production database. This would make the data transfer a lot easier.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They each have their pros/cons so I'm looking for thoughts on this or any other possible options.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alina&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlinaTaus</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-14T12:45:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Looking for ideas on designing a field data collection workflow</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/looking-for-ideas-on-designing-a-field-data/m-p/655000#M11289</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We recently purchased new high-accuracy GPS units that integrate very well with Collector. I am trying to figure out what the best option would be for setting up the data collection layer(s). We have Server so most likely I would be hosting the layers internally and not in ArcGIS Online, although I haven't ruled that option out. We manage three different systems (water, sewer and storm) so that's a lot of assets that need to be collected. Most often we would be collecting points either for as-builts (so the more attributes we can collect in the filed the faster we can get the as-builts done); to update the XYZ of assets we already have in our system; or for planning a reconstruction project.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two options that I've come up with so far are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1. Create one feature class for all the points and use subtypes and domains to control the drop-down lists. If I set the subtype based on my system (water, sewer, storm) then I can better control the type of assets and attribute values that would be available when a new record is collected.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;2. Create separate feature classes for each asset. I would set these layers up to have the same schema as my existing feature classes in my production database. This would make the data transfer a lot easier.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They each have their pros/cons so I'm looking for thoughts on this or any other possible options.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alina&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-questions/looking-for-ideas-on-designing-a-field-data/m-p/655000#M11289</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlinaTaus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-14T12:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

