<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea GPS Quality Control - Double Occupations in ArcGIS Collector Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idi-p/933616</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As collector has started to support&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4c4c4c;"&gt;high-accuracy receivers it would be good to have the ability to follow good survey practise for GPS measurements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4c4c4c;"&gt;It would be good if we had to measure a point twice (say 20mins between each set of measurements) we could have the option of another set of measurements which would be used to calculate a weighted average position for the point using the two sets of measurements. This could also flag any error in a measurement if the 2 measurements did not agree within a certain limit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second measurement on the point is to obtain an independent fix by having different satellites in a different constellation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HughWyn-Harris</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-29T00:59:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GPS Quality Control - Double Occupations</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idi-p/933616</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As collector has started to support&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4c4c4c;"&gt;high-accuracy receivers it would be good to have the ability to follow good survey practise for GPS measurements.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #4c4c4c;"&gt;It would be good if we had to measure a point twice (say 20mins between each set of measurements) we could have the option of another set of measurements which would be used to calculate a weighted average position for the point using the two sets of measurements. This could also flag any error in a measurement if the 2 measurements did not agree within a certain limit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second measurement on the point is to obtain an independent fix by having different satellites in a different constellation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 00:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idi-p/933616</guid>
      <dc:creator>HughWyn-Harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-29T00:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GPS Quality Control - Double Occupations</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idc-p/933617#M392</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think a lot of users are going to want to GPS a location a second time 20 minutes later&amp;nbsp;in the hopes of increasing accuracy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think your better option is to purchase a better quality GPS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Often people will use their phones or the GPS unit they purchased at a Fleet Farm and find out they are not terribly accurate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:00:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idc-p/933617#M392</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertBorchert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-29T13:00:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GPS Quality Control - Double Occupations</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idc-p/933618#M393</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Robert,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you are right, this probably would not be useful for users using lower accuracy GPS units.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However users chasing centimetre accuracies will know the importance of following good survey practise to ensure their measurements have the appropriate checks therefore confirming the reliability of their data.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know users that have better quality GPS would like to measure survey control a 2nd time so it adds redundancy to their data-sets and confirms they are working in terms of the correct coordinate system.&amp;nbsp;RTK GNSS observations on control marks&amp;nbsp;are measured at least twice with a 20 – 30 minutes interval between observations as to check against ionospheric &amp;amp; tropospheric delay, multipath and receiver noise. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-collector-ideas/gps-quality-control-double-occupations/idc-p/933618#M393</guid>
      <dc:creator>HughWyn-Harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-29T20:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

