<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Suggestion: Support for PBR texture maps in ArcGIS CityEngine Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482531#M6528</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a suggestion for&amp;nbsp;the next version:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was thinking, since now most render engine support PBR, wouldn't it be a blast to update the maps that CE can digest so that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Base Color&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Roughness,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Normals&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Metallic&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and maybe (Height, Opacity, Emission and AO) are included?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not saying they should render correctly, just that there should be a "slot" for them, a dedicated UV set. So that you can plug in Substances outputs maps directly in CE&amp;nbsp;and when you export the connections are already there and&amp;nbsp; it renders PBR correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Base color, normal and Opacity are there already, so it would be like rearranging connections a bit and add a couple ones&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/grin.png" /&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think CE people, is it something doable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AbeleGiandoso</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-13T09:54:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestion: Support for PBR texture maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482531#M6528</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a suggestion for&amp;nbsp;the next version:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was thinking, since now most render engine support PBR, wouldn't it be a blast to update the maps that CE can digest so that&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Base Color&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Roughness,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Normals&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Metallic&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and maybe (Height, Opacity, Emission and AO) are included?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not saying they should render correctly, just that there should be a "slot" for them, a dedicated UV set. So that you can plug in Substances outputs maps directly in CE&amp;nbsp;and when you export the connections are already there and&amp;nbsp; it renders PBR correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Base color, normal and Opacity are there already, so it would be like rearranging connections a bit and add a couple ones&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/grin.png" /&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What do you think CE people, is it something doable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 09:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482531#M6528</guid>
      <dc:creator>AbeleGiandoso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T09:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestion: Support for PBR texture maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482532#M6529</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;A good spot to put suggestions is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/space/2167"&gt;ArcGIS Ideas&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it gains traction, then it might be implemented&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:14:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482532#M6529</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T10:14:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestion: Support for PBR texture maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482533#M6530</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abele&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You might want to advertise this thread...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will link this thread to the idea&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/ideas/15532" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/ideas/15532&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:35:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482533#M6530</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-22T08:35:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suggestion: Support for PBR texture maps</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482534#M6531</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good point! I added it there &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/grin.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 11:14:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/suggestion-support-for-pbr-texture-maps/m-p/482534#M6531</guid>
      <dc:creator>AbeleGiandoso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-13T11:14:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

