<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Points to Trees Rule File in ArcGIS CityEngine Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/points-to-trees-rule-file/m-p/255608#M3373</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The trees in this rule file appear to be not to scale; they're much larger than they should be. Is there another vegetation rule file out there with better trees? If not, am I better off selecting all tree points at the same time and scaling them in CE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KathrynAngleton</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-22T14:17:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Points to Trees Rule File</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/points-to-trees-rule-file/m-p/255608#M3373</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The trees in this rule file appear to be not to scale; they're much larger than they should be. Is there another vegetation rule file out there with better trees? If not, am I better off selecting all tree points at the same time and scaling them in CE?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:17:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-questions/points-to-trees-rule-file/m-p/255608#M3373</guid>
      <dc:creator>KathrynAngleton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-01-22T14:17:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

