<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Basic Export to Geodatabase Support (v2017) in ArcGIS CityEngine Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/basic-export-to-geodatabase-support-v2017/idi-p/944661</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since version 2017 "export to file-geodatabase" is only available in advanced-version, before 2017 this was also part of the basic version - which we use to edit / build single 3D-modells for ArcGIS (like "sketchup for ArcGis").&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is ridiculous - How will you achieve seamless integration in ArcGIS if you do not (basic) support your own in-house-Formats, which was our main reason to buy cityengine?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now its (again) easier and cheaper to use Google Sketchup and import to ArcGIS via other File-Formats... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please take back that decision and continue to license "export to gdb" as part of the basic license, as it used to be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DirkSilbermann</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-08T10:33:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basic Export to Geodatabase Support (v2017)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/basic-export-to-geodatabase-support-v2017/idi-p/944661</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since version 2017 "export to file-geodatabase" is only available in advanced-version, before 2017 this was also part of the basic version - which we use to edit / build single 3D-modells for ArcGIS (like "sketchup for ArcGis").&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is ridiculous - How will you achieve seamless integration in ArcGIS if you do not (basic) support your own in-house-Formats, which was our main reason to buy cityengine?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now its (again) easier and cheaper to use Google Sketchup and import to ArcGIS via other File-Formats... &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please take back that decision and continue to license "export to gdb" as part of the basic license, as it used to be.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:33:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/basic-export-to-geodatabase-support-v2017/idi-p/944661</guid>
      <dc:creator>DirkSilbermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-08T10:33:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basic Export to Geodatabase Support (v2017) - Status changed to: Already Offered</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/basic-export-to-geodatabase-support-v2017/idc-p/1211946#M265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dirk&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This has been resolved as the licensing model has been simplified.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2022 12:08:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/basic-export-to-geodatabase-support-v2017/idc-p/1211946#M265</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristianIten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-13T12:08:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

