<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea CityEngine for Underground Infrastructure in ArcGIS CityEngine Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idi-p/930054</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Working for a civil engineering firm I think it would be great if CityEngine could be used as a way of modeling underground infrastructure, such as:&amp;nbsp;sewer networks and water distribution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CityEngine looks to be an awesome visualization tool with great detail. &amp;nbsp;Having the ability to pull in attribute data from GIS&amp;nbsp;utilities and have it displayed in such a rich environment I&amp;nbsp;think would provide a great way for municipalities and private companies alike to 'see' their infrastructure and how it is related in 3D space.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some of the key fields I&amp;nbsp;can think of to start with in building a working model would be:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;StructureID - unique ID of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Rim Elevation - elevation at top of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Depth - depth of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Invert Elevation - elevation at bottom of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Diameter - diameter of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Material - material of structure (ex:&amp;nbsp;concrete, brick, block, wood, etc...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pipe Diameter - diameter of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pipe Material - material of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Upstream Pipe Elevation - elevation at upstream end of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Downstream Pipe Elevation - elevation at downstream end of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;PipeID - unique ID&amp;nbsp;of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Surface - import from TIN, DEM, contours, etc...&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
These are just some of my quick thoughts on the subject, but I think having the ability to visualize an underground network in such a detailed and rich environment like CityEngine would be something that is unlike anything out there right now.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000bt3Q --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MatthewBoyle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-12-19T13:29:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CityEngine for Underground Infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idi-p/930054</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;Working for a civil engineering firm I think it would be great if CityEngine could be used as a way of modeling underground infrastructure, such as:&amp;nbsp;sewer networks and water distribution.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;CityEngine looks to be an awesome visualization tool with great detail. &amp;nbsp;Having the ability to pull in attribute data from GIS&amp;nbsp;utilities and have it displayed in such a rich environment I&amp;nbsp;think would provide a great way for municipalities and private companies alike to 'see' their infrastructure and how it is related in 3D space.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Some of the key fields I&amp;nbsp;can think of to start with in building a working model would be:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;StructureID - unique ID of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Rim Elevation - elevation at top of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Depth - depth of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Invert Elevation - elevation at bottom of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Diameter - diameter of structure&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Structure Material - material of structure (ex:&amp;nbsp;concrete, brick, block, wood, etc...)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pipe Diameter - diameter of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Pipe Material - material of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Upstream Pipe Elevation - elevation at upstream end of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Downstream Pipe Elevation - elevation at downstream end of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;PipeID - unique ID&amp;nbsp;of pipe&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Surface - import from TIN, DEM, contours, etc...&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
These are just some of my quick thoughts on the subject, but I think having the ability to visualize an underground network in such a detailed and rich environment like CityEngine would be something that is unlike anything out there right now.

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 08730000000bt3Q --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idi-p/930054</guid>
      <dc:creator>MatthewBoyle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-19T13:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine for Underground Infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idc-p/930055#M40</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;I've been modelling some utility networks (pipes and electricty) in CityEngine, some of what you ask for can be done already. &amp;nbsp;My blog post has one example "&lt;A href="http://www.geoplanit.co.uk/?p=700" target="_blank"&gt;Modelling Utility Networks&lt;/A&gt;", I'll be posting soon about modelling a basic pipe network. &amp;nbsp; It really is just using a rule file to model a pipe instead of street though so has so issues...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE0000000W1Hb --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:14:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idc-p/930055#M40</guid>
      <dc:creator>ElliotHartley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-06T09:14:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine for Underground Infrastructure</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idc-p/930056#M41</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;CE should have some easy/flexible ‘component-based or model-based’ capabilities for more complex engineering designs, including facility and utility, in particular, like piping. Those components/models should be pre-defined and stored in the library catalogs, at least, which should be like some extensions for Trimble Sketchup (saying, 3Skeng at &lt;A href="http://www.3skeng.com/en/3slibrary.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.3skeng.com/en/3slibrary.htm&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With ‘pure’ rulesets or ‘current’ design tools, it is very challenging for us to get those complex engineering designing/planning works done 'effectively' in CE …&lt;BR /&gt;

&lt;!-- content transformation source ID: 00aE00000032VXk --&gt;

&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:46:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-for-underground-infrastructure/idc-p/930056#M41</guid>
      <dc:creator>larryzhang1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T14:46:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

