<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea in ArcGIS CityEngine Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idi-p/1024218</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;One more idea today.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I'm starting to wrap my head around the increasingly useful polygonal modeling tools and how to use them efficiently to write new CGA code.&amp;nbsp; I think there is something really special about being able to quickly model a shape I can't easily manually code,&amp;nbsp; and then use it my CGA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I think there are two key features missing to making this a homerun!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. During polygonal shape modeling the new shape tool attributes is useful, but it would be nicer if I didn't have to lock it each time I want to set a number.&amp;nbsp; In Sketchup you just type a number after you extrude and it auto-locks to that for one assignment.&amp;nbsp; You can also retroactively assign height.&amp;nbsp; That is much faster when doing a lot of modeling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; The streets have a graph tool "convert to statics shapes" but do not seem to have one for polygonal shape modeling.&amp;nbsp; This would be tremendously useful.&amp;nbsp; It would also be nice if we could define the starting scope by initial point and edge, to simplify the usage in CGA afterwards.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I know I could export the selection as an fbx and then use that, but it would be nice if that was automated as a static shape with a definable scope.&amp;nbsp; I don't know, maybe an fbx export is best?&amp;nbsp; Maybe there could be a "quick FBX&amp;nbsp;export button" that exported straight to a predefined asset folder?&amp;nbsp; It's worth thinking about how to make this workflow the absolute best.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks CE Team for this amazing program and hard work to make it the best!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 18:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-07T18:11:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idi-p/1024218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;One more idea today.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I'm starting to wrap my head around the increasingly useful polygonal modeling tools and how to use them efficiently to write new CGA code.&amp;nbsp; I think there is something really special about being able to quickly model a shape I can't easily manually code,&amp;nbsp; and then use it my CGA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I think there are two key features missing to making this a homerun!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. During polygonal shape modeling the new shape tool attributes is useful, but it would be nicer if I didn't have to lock it each time I want to set a number.&amp;nbsp; In Sketchup you just type a number after you extrude and it auto-locks to that for one assignment.&amp;nbsp; You can also retroactively assign height.&amp;nbsp; That is much faster when doing a lot of modeling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; The streets have a graph tool "convert to statics shapes" but do not seem to have one for polygonal shape modeling.&amp;nbsp; This would be tremendously useful.&amp;nbsp; It would also be nice if we could define the starting scope by initial point and edge, to simplify the usage in CGA afterwards.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; I know I could export the selection as an fbx and then use that, but it would be nice if that was automated as a static shape with a definable scope.&amp;nbsp; I don't know, maybe an fbx export is best?&amp;nbsp; Maybe there could be a "quick FBX&amp;nbsp;export button" that exported straight to a predefined asset folder?&amp;nbsp; It's worth thinking about how to make this workflow the absolute best.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks CE Team for this amazing program and hard work to make it the best!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 18:11:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idi-p/1024218</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-07T18:11:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1024336#M193</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I should say, that after posting this I did export an fbx and looked into the presets more.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;You can set up a simple fbx export (no terrain, no textures (our your preference here), faces separate for editing, etc.), assign it a "default export state", which can be targeted to a specific folder.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;And setting up the scope is done mostly by setting the first edge.&amp;nbsp; So number 2 is just nearly there.&amp;nbsp; For some people, it might just be learning about setting up some predefined default option as I had.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:17:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1024336#M193</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-08T14:17:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1030533#M195</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Brian,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your feedback and nice that you like CE &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regarding your suggestions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) This is currently not possible; however you can achieve something similar when you use TAB (before or while your drawing action) then enter a value and hit ENTER to lock it in.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) I'm not sure if I fully understand what you want to achieve here (if not let me know), but you can select CGA generated models from graphs and then apply "Shapes -&amp;gt; Convert Models to Shapes" onto your selection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope this helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;BR /&gt;Jonas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:52:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1030533#M195</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonasObertuefer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T16:52:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1030729#M198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/456972"&gt;@JonasObertuefer&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for the response!&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your follow-up question:&amp;nbsp; I was not looking to generate a model from graph but from the polygonal modeling tools.&amp;nbsp; In my follow-up comment above I remarked that I did discover a workflow that works smoother that I had originally known.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I figured out that I should be setting up a model export preset, which is directed towards a preset folder location with predefined settings for my purpose.&amp;nbsp; It becomes a very fast exercise to export simple volumes once I did that.&amp;nbsp; After getting used to this workflow, I think its fine.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1030729#M198</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T21:23:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CityEngine Polygon Modeling Tool enhancement idea</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1032374#M201</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@Anonymous User&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ah I think I understand you now.&amp;nbsp; There is &lt;A href="https://doc.arcgis.com/en/cityengine/latest/tutorials/tutorial-14c-combining-polygonal-modeling-with-rules.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Tutorial 14c&lt;/A&gt; available showing a workflow in a similar direction. But its a valid point you’re bringing up here, maybe we can improve/simplify this workflow in the future, so thanks again for your feedback!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 12:46:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-cityengine-ideas/cityengine-polygon-modeling-tool-enhancement-idea/idc-p/1032374#M201</guid>
      <dc:creator>JonasObertuefer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-03-03T12:46:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

