<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Slow feature layer performance for large dataset in ArcGIS API for Silverlight Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/slow-feature-layer-performance-for-large-dataset/m-p/371306#M9582</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've just been doing some prototyping of incorporating a two feature layers (X. poly), one for purpose of editing, one for purpose of snapping (Y. line).&amp;nbsp; Feature layer X is&amp;nbsp; a light-weight poly dataset whereas feature layer Y is a ultimately a heavy dataset (OSMM topo layer (line) for those familiar with Ordnance Survey data (UK)).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have both an issue (performance) &amp;amp; a couple of queries:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Performance for feature layer Y is unacceptably slow to draw (I say this in light of the performance provide via the JS API for similar prototype environment (which is almost instantaneous (1-2 sec) whereas SL performance is the order of minutes (approx 5 mins)). Feature service is set-up for OnDemand mode &amp;amp; i have scale range set to only display below 1:500.&amp;nbsp; Note my OnDemandCacheSize is just default (1000).&amp;nbsp; SL API v2.3 / AGS 10.1 SP2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What gives @ESRI?&amp;nbsp; Is this a consequence of a poor transport model for data via Silverlight from server to client?&amp;nbsp; Is this an ESRI SL API issue?&amp;nbsp; Are things likely to improve in the future with the SL API?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; When dealing with v. large feature layers, is there any recommended approaches (other than simplifying your data)?&amp;nbsp; Does the fact i have a scale ranges set at MXD have any impact on the features being retrieved by the service on startup extent?&amp;nbsp; Is there any point in caching the data (noting i just want this feature layer as a reference layer).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Appreciate any insight into this topic.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brad&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-25T13:12:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Slow feature layer performance for large dataset</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/slow-feature-layer-performance-for-large-dataset/m-p/371306#M9582</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've just been doing some prototyping of incorporating a two feature layers (X. poly), one for purpose of editing, one for purpose of snapping (Y. line).&amp;nbsp; Feature layer X is&amp;nbsp; a light-weight poly dataset whereas feature layer Y is a ultimately a heavy dataset (OSMM topo layer (line) for those familiar with Ordnance Survey data (UK)).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have both an issue (performance) &amp;amp; a couple of queries:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Performance for feature layer Y is unacceptably slow to draw (I say this in light of the performance provide via the JS API for similar prototype environment (which is almost instantaneous (1-2 sec) whereas SL performance is the order of minutes (approx 5 mins)). Feature service is set-up for OnDemand mode &amp;amp; i have scale range set to only display below 1:500.&amp;nbsp; Note my OnDemandCacheSize is just default (1000).&amp;nbsp; SL API v2.3 / AGS 10.1 SP2.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What gives @ESRI?&amp;nbsp; Is this a consequence of a poor transport model for data via Silverlight from server to client?&amp;nbsp; Is this an ESRI SL API issue?&amp;nbsp; Are things likely to improve in the future with the SL API?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; When dealing with v. large feature layers, is there any recommended approaches (other than simplifying your data)?&amp;nbsp; Does the fact i have a scale ranges set at MXD have any impact on the features being retrieved by the service on startup extent?&amp;nbsp; Is there any point in caching the data (noting i just want this feature layer as a reference layer).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Appreciate any insight into this topic.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Brad&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:12:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/slow-feature-layer-performance-for-large-dataset/m-p/371306#M9582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-25T13:12:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

