<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MeasureAction:&amp;nbsp; geodesic area? in ArcGIS API for Silverlight Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246763#M6407</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've noticed that in the online MeasureAction sample, the perimeter is correct but the area is off compared to a similar measurement in a projected coordinate system.&amp;nbsp; Is a cartesian or geodesic calculation used for the area?&amp;nbsp; I've adapted the geodesic area code from GRASS and the results compare favorably to the projected results.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-19T18:43:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MeasureAction:  geodesic area?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246763#M6407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've noticed that in the online MeasureAction sample, the perimeter is correct but the area is off compared to a similar measurement in a projected coordinate system.&amp;nbsp; Is a cartesian or geodesic calculation used for the area?&amp;nbsp; I've adapted the geodesic area code from GRASS and the results compare favorably to the projected results.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246763#M6407</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-19T18:43:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MeasureAction:  geodesic area?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246764#M6408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Geodesic calculation is only used when using a map with geographic coordinates. For anything else, euclidean calculations are used, so "beware of projection distortion".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:12:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246764#M6408</guid>
      <dc:creator>dotMorten_esri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-19T20:12:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MeasureAction:  geodesic area?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246765#M6409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;By "online" sample I mean the one published by ESRI at the API for Silverlight resource center.&amp;nbsp; It uses the Streetmap_2D service, which is in geographic coordinates.&amp;nbsp; I was assuming knowledge of this in my original post.&amp;nbsp; To verify the measurements, I brought the same service into ArcMap and projected it to UTM (WGS 84) for the area I was testing.&amp;nbsp; In the sample, the MeasureAction's map units are set to DD, and the perimeter calculation is correct, so obviously the geodesic distance algorithm is used in that case.&amp;nbsp; It is the area calculation that I am bringing into question.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:16:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/measureaction-nbsp-geodesic-area/m-p/246765#M6409</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-19T20:16:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

