<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance for Feature Layers in ArcGIS API for Silverlight Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/performance-for-feature-layers/m-p/233031#M5991</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you try v3.0 if there's any performance gain?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JenniferNery</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-03T17:23:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance for Feature Layers</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/performance-for-feature-layers/m-p/233030#M5990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is some performance hit with feature layers for polylines and polygon features (Silverlight API 2.4).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I implemented MaxAllowableOffset and that increased performance by 7 fold.&amp;nbsp; But still delay of 10 seconds or so for some of the feature layers (with only small fraction of production data).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using OnDemand mode with OnDemandCacheSize of 1000 (I've tried 0 to 50 to 1000).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For MaxAllowableOffset using: MapResolution * factor, where factor ranged from 2 to 2000.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there other performance optimization techniques available...?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:04:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/performance-for-feature-layers/m-p/233030#M5990</guid>
      <dc:creator>EdwardSon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T17:04:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance for Feature Layers</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/performance-for-feature-layers/m-p/233031#M5991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you try v3.0 if there's any performance gain?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/performance-for-feature-layers/m-p/233031#M5991</guid>
      <dc:creator>JenniferNery</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T17:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

