<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Good in ArcGIS API for Silverlight Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103770#M2613</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Looking forward to them.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-12T05:56:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nice to have</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103768#M2611</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;More doc on using blend, especially with all the potential properties that we can set using the interface.&amp;nbsp; Properties that are not relevant to core blend functionality.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now 1.1 is 100% better for Blend than 1.0.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103768#M2611</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T20:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Nice to have</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103769#M2612</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We have a bunch of small to-the-point tutorials/workthroughs in the works. Keep an eye on our blog...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103769#M2612</guid>
      <dc:creator>dotMorten_esri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-11T23:10:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Good</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103770#M2613</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Looking forward to them.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 05:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/nice-to-have/m-p/103770#M2613</guid>
      <dc:creator>TedCronin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-12T05:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

