<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dynamic Raster image format in ArcGIS API for Silverlight Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526305#M13558</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: qpsitas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well, I have tried the HeatMapLayer option, and it is really fast... but I have an issue with the way&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the rendering changes with the zoom level (as opposed to a kernel density raster). For example at a high zoom level I see a really hot spot and then when I zoom in, that hot spot splits into individual hot and cold spots.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To be honest I've always used the Kernel Density tool and I'm fairly comfortable with that approach whereas I only have one day of experience with the HeatMapLayer and I'm still figuring it out...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also, I am really wondering what everyone else is doing because I thought that dynamically generating density maps or hotspot (Getis-Ord) would be so widespread, but I could only find a handful of posts in the Esri forum!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My ideal solution would be one where the heatmap is generated on the server and the appropriate color bands are applied, and the pattern supports concurrency. Ideas anyone?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-03T22:05:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic Raster image format</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526303#M13556</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: qpsitas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I published a toolbox model generating a raster and it looks fine in ArcMap but when I use the wpf rest api (i.e. using the SubmitJobAsync &amp;amp; GetResultImageLayerAsync pattern), it basically looks like a black-and-white blob with no gradient!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question 1: Is there a way to specify the format of the image that is generated by the model other than tiff?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Question 2: Is there a preferred way to dynamically generate and display a heatmap style raster with the wpf api?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:27:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526303#M13556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T02:27:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Raster image format</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526304#M13557</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The Toolkit.DataSources assembly already has a client-side generated heatmap layer. Can't you use that?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Example: &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/webapi/silverlight/samples/start.htm#HeatMapLayerSimple"&gt;http://help.arcgis.com/en/webapi/silverlight/samples/start.htm#HeatMapLayerSimple&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526304#M13557</guid>
      <dc:creator>dotMorten_esri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T18:13:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic Raster image format</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526305#M13558</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Original User: qpsitas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Well, I have tried the HeatMapLayer option, and it is really fast... but I have an issue with the way&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;the rendering changes with the zoom level (as opposed to a kernel density raster). For example at a high zoom level I see a really hot spot and then when I zoom in, that hot spot splits into individual hot and cold spots.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;To be honest I've always used the Kernel Density tool and I'm fairly comfortable with that approach whereas I only have one day of experience with the HeatMapLayer and I'm still figuring it out...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Also, I am really wondering what everyone else is doing because I thought that dynamically generating density maps or hotspot (Getis-Ord) would be so widespread, but I could only find a handful of posts in the Esri forum!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My ideal solution would be one where the heatmap is generated on the server and the appropriate color bands are applied, and the pattern supports concurrency. Ideas anyone?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:05:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-silverlight-questions/dynamic-raster-image-format/m-p/526305#M13558</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-03T22:05:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

