<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Geoprocessing Tool input SEDF output SEDF in ArcGIS API for Python Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1147791#M7164</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That is the way I do it.&amp;nbsp; This would be a great enhancement.&amp;nbsp; It seems to me that ESRI just keeps reimplementing AML with its read/write to disk file paradigm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 23:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DavidAnderson_1701</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-24T23:08:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Geoprocessing Tool input SEDF output SEDF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1145962#M7145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Arcpy geoprocessing tools seem to accept SEDFs as input.&amp;nbsp; How can one output to an SEDF?&amp;nbsp; The only thing I can think of is to write to memory\tempOutput then convert that output to an SEDF with spatial.from_featureclass() but this seems a little too Rube Goldberg.&amp;nbsp; Any thoughts.&amp;nbsp; Thx.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tyler&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2022 17:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1145962#M7145</guid>
      <dc:creator>TylerTownes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-20T17:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geoprocessing Tool input SEDF output SEDF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1145967#M7147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Put in an Enhancement request under "Issues" on their github site&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-python-api/issues" target="_blank"&gt;Issues · Esri/arcgis-python-api (github.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2022 03:02:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1145967#M7147</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-20T03:02:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Geoprocessing Tool input SEDF output SEDF</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1147791#M7164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is the way I do it.&amp;nbsp; This would be a great enhancement.&amp;nbsp; It seems to me that ESRI just keeps reimplementing AML with its read/write to disk file paradigm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 23:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-python-questions/geoprocessing-tool-input-sedf-output-sedf/m-p/1147791#M7164</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidAnderson_1701</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-24T23:08:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

