<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Alternative to Editor Widget's supportingwidgetDefaults in ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/alternative-to-editor-widget-s/m-p/1056794#M73045</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;supportingWidgetDefaults property of the Editor Widget defines featureForm as an array of optional fieldConfig objects. However, the fieldConfig object of the FeatureForm widget is depreciated. (&lt;A href="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-widgets-FeatureForm.html#fieldConfig" target="_self"&gt;source&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't the supportingWidgetDefaults property be updated to support a featureForm with an array of FieldElement and/or GroupElement objects? Or, maybe a formTemplate object?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for a way to change the Editor's template based on workflow. If a user is updating, the fields should be configured differently than if a user is adding. It is a bit confusing if this should be managed by supportingWidgetDefaults as the documentation supports using a depreciated object model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 18:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PhilLarkin1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-11T18:03:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternative to Editor Widget's supportingwidgetDefaults</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/alternative-to-editor-widget-s/m-p/1056794#M73045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The&amp;nbsp;supportingWidgetDefaults property of the Editor Widget defines featureForm as an array of optional fieldConfig objects. However, the fieldConfig object of the FeatureForm widget is depreciated. (&lt;A href="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-widgets-FeatureForm.html#fieldConfig" target="_self"&gt;source&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Shouldn't the supportingWidgetDefaults property be updated to support a featureForm with an array of FieldElement and/or GroupElement objects? Or, maybe a formTemplate object?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm looking for a way to change the Editor's template based on workflow. If a user is updating, the fields should be configured differently than if a user is adding. It is a bit confusing if this should be managed by supportingWidgetDefaults as the documentation supports using a depreciated object model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 18:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/alternative-to-editor-widget-s/m-p/1056794#M73045</guid>
      <dc:creator>PhilLarkin1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-11T18:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

