<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using Secure Services in ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/using-secure-services/m-p/715137#M66454</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am creating an application that will be editable by select internal users but publically accessible to everybody. Is the best practice to serve up identical services (one publically viewable and one privately viewable)? Or is there a way to only use 1 service and have the the editor widget only viewable by those with the proper credentials?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using windows authentication to control the users, so hopefully this can be done without an additional sign on in the app, similar to the Identity Manager, but if thats the best way, we will go with it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CraigMcDade</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-01T12:41:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using Secure Services</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/using-secure-services/m-p/715137#M66454</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am creating an application that will be editable by select internal users but publically accessible to everybody. Is the best practice to serve up identical services (one publically viewable and one privately viewable)? Or is there a way to only use 1 service and have the the editor widget only viewable by those with the proper credentials?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am using windows authentication to control the users, so hopefully this can be done without an additional sign on in the app, similar to the Identity Manager, but if thats the best way, we will go with it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/using-secure-services/m-p/715137#M66454</guid>
      <dc:creator>CraigMcDade</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-01T12:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using Secure Services</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/using-secure-services/m-p/715138#M66455</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I've not come across a way to make one service have two different types of access. If you enable security and feature access on a service then any role/user that has access to the service has editing access to it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The only way I know of to have this level of control is two services.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 13:57:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/using-secure-services/m-p/715138#M66455</guid>
      <dc:creator>MattLane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-01T13:57:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

