<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future? in ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655344#M61119</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don't know if we can say they agreed or maybe that everybody felt forced to follow Google...but I guess they picked the best system.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Still, after years of "avoiding on the fly projection" to improve performance I am reluctant to go for it now... I don't know if the fact that is run client side makes me feel reassured! Maybe is better to start storing data in web Mercator. Time and testing will tell.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you everybody for the input!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FrancescaRiolo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-29T20:37:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655340#M61115</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Anybody knows if ESRI is planning to provide the new ArcGIS Online basemaps also in geographic coordinates (wkid:4326) in the near future? This was the spatial reference used in the old basemaps (currently under "Extended support" status) while the new map services are all in WebMercator (wkid: 102100). This means always having to project data stored in geographic coordinates.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655340#M61115</guid>
      <dc:creator>FrancescaRiolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-26T09:41:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655341#M61116</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ESRI changed these to match with Google and Bing which use WebMercator.&amp;nbsp; This way the tiling scheme is the same for all the primary base maps sources.&amp;nbsp; I cannot see that they would ever change back to WGS as it would mean having to support two different sets of cached maps.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I agree that WGS84 makes a lot more sense to use as a projection&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 10:51:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655341#M61116</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeHershman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-26T10:51:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655342#M61117</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If you want to convert coordinates from web mercator to wgs84, use &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://help.arcgis.com/en/webapi/javascript/arcgis/help/jsapi/namespace_geometry.htm#webMercatorToGeographic"&gt;esri.geometry.webMercatorToGeographic&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The coordinate conversion is done client side and does not require anything from a server.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:39:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655342#M61117</guid>
      <dc:creator>derekswingley1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-29T15:39:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655343#M61118</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i actually feel its a "miracle" everyone (GOOGLE, BING, ESRI, OPEN STREET MAPS) found a way to all agree on a coordinate system.&amp;nbsp; I think lat/long would be a monster step backwards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think we are actually at a state where the coordinate system doesnt really matter, and as developers should be nearly or completely transparent to the end user.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 18:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655343#M61118</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffPace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-29T18:13:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655344#M61119</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I don't know if we can say they agreed or maybe that everybody felt forced to follow Google...but I guess they picked the best system.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Still, after years of "avoiding on the fly projection" to improve performance I am reluctant to go for it now... I don't know if the fact that is run client side makes me feel reassured! Maybe is better to start storing data in web Mercator. Time and testing will tell.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you everybody for the input!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 20:37:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655344#M61119</guid>
      <dc:creator>FrancescaRiolo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-29T20:37:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Basemaps in geographic coordinates in the future?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655345#M61120</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;ok maybe agree wasnt the right word, how about "begrudgingly work together"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For us, not a single agency we work with (including ourselves) would ever stored data in lat/long.&amp;nbsp; We have been using on the fly projection in the data frame to web mercator and performance has been more than satisfactory.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just tile more, and the coversion is precomputed, at least for display &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:26:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/basemaps-in-geographic-coordinates-in-the-future/m-p/655345#M61120</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffPace</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-30T11:26:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

