<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ArcGIS 4.0 vs 3.0 in ArcGIS JavaScript Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562249#M52493</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best thing they could add to the API 4.0:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AGS JS TOC --&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html" title="http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html"&gt;http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;current toc in API is more limited and we will continue with AGS for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second best: incorporate Robert's Identify or create an Identify dijit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Third: 3D. But that's coming. And it's awesome. Good job on 3D, Esri, very good. The 3D with the high-detail Pictometry derived obliques is AWESOME people. SimCity, rectified. This is why I love doing GIS. I imagine it will be helpful and even save lives! For search &amp;amp; rescue, police &amp;amp; fire, etc. As well as an incredible tool for planners and businesses, like with shadow modeling tool. That is just cool.&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-09T12:39:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS 4.0 vs 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562246#M52490</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked &lt;A href="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/beta/api-reference/" title="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/beta/api-reference/"&gt;Index | API Reference | ArcGIS API for JavaScript&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for ArcGIS 4.0 beta. I see that many features of 3.0 version&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/jsapi/" title="https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/jsapi/"&gt;API Reference Overview | API Reference | ArcGIS API for JavaScript&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;are not found in 4.0. For example&amp;nbsp; esri/toolbars, &lt;SPAN style="color: #636363; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20.8px; background-color: #fefefe;"&gt;ArcGISDynamicMapServiceLayer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #636363; font-family: 'Lucida Grande', 'Segoe UI', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 20.8px; background-color: #fefefe;"&gt;and many, many other. Is this the final version of 4.0 or missing features will be added later?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:08:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562246#M52490</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvgenyKleiman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-09T08:08:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS 4.0 vs 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562247#M52491</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;H1&gt;ESRI - Status&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;Version 4.0 is in the initial beta phase. We are planning multiple betas before the 4.0 release next year. It is important to note that the first beta is primarily a developer preview with limited functionality and that the existing 3.x API is still supported and being developed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 08:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562247#M52491</guid>
      <dc:creator>yoavhermoni</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-09T08:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS 4.0 vs 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562248#M52492</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;תודה , יואב.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that you' ll answer to 2 my other questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562248#M52492</guid>
      <dc:creator>EvgenyKleiman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-09T09:28:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS 4.0 vs 3.0</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562249#M52493</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best thing they could add to the API 4.0:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AGS JS TOC --&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html" title="http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html"&gt;http://gmaps-utility-gis.googlecode.com/svn/tags/agsjs/latest/examples/toc_amd.html&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;current toc in API is more limited and we will continue with AGS for now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Second best: incorporate Robert's Identify or create an Identify dijit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Third: 3D. But that's coming. And it's awesome. Good job on 3D, Esri, very good. The 3D with the high-detail Pictometry derived obliques is AWESOME people. SimCity, rectified. This is why I love doing GIS. I imagine it will be helpful and even save lives! For search &amp;amp; rescue, police &amp;amp; fire, etc. As well as an incredible tool for planners and businesses, like with shadow modeling tool. That is just cool.&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-javascript-maps-sdk-questions/arcgis-4-0-vs-3-0/m-p/562249#M52493</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-09T12:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

