<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic @ESRI: Please consider dividing the entire Flex API forum into 1.3 &amp;amp;amp; 2.x. in ArcGIS API for Flex Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/esri-please-consider-dividing-the-entire-flex-api/m-p/176742#M4159</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Reading through the threads I get the sense that many resolutions are API/SDK version based. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just a thought...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>xanderm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-22T11:12:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>@ESRI: Please consider dividing the entire Flex API forum into 1.3 &amp;amp; 2.x.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/esri-please-consider-dividing-the-entire-flex-api/m-p/176742#M4159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Reading through the threads I get the sense that many resolutions are API/SDK version based. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Just a thought...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 11:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/esri-please-consider-dividing-the-entire-flex-api/m-p/176742#M4159</guid>
      <dc:creator>xanderm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-22T11:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

