<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Limitations for definition queries? in ArcGIS API for Flex Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588578#M13187</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm currently querying 6,000 or so polygons from a service as part of my app startup, adding them to a "local" featurelayer via a featurecollection, and using them effectively for local data editing and exploration.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Performance on panning would be better, though, if I could render the unedited polygons on the server and only the edited ones locally.&amp;nbsp; Before I explore that route, though I'd like to understand&amp;nbsp; the limitations on definition query complexity.&amp;nbsp; We might have several hundred edits (out of 6,000).&amp;nbsp; Could I feed a definition query to the server that amounted to "give me everything except these 295 specific features?".&amp;nbsp; (Past experience makes me suspicious of long definition queries.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Charlie Richman&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;DC Office of Planning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharlieRichman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-05T21:16:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Limitations for definition queries?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588578#M13187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm currently querying 6,000 or so polygons from a service as part of my app startup, adding them to a "local" featurelayer via a featurecollection, and using them effectively for local data editing and exploration.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Performance on panning would be better, though, if I could render the unedited polygons on the server and only the edited ones locally.&amp;nbsp; Before I explore that route, though I'd like to understand&amp;nbsp; the limitations on definition query complexity.&amp;nbsp; We might have several hundred edits (out of 6,000).&amp;nbsp; Could I feed a definition query to the server that amounted to "give me everything except these 295 specific features?".&amp;nbsp; (Past experience makes me suspicious of long definition queries.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Charlie Richman&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;DC Office of Planning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588578#M13187</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieRichman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-05T21:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Limitations for definition queries?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588579#M13188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes you can &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is similar to how we do the 'onDemand' mode for a FeatureLayer (by not asking for the OBJECTIDs that are already on the client).&amp;nbsp; If you do it on any other field make sure it's indexed properly.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588579#M13188</guid>
      <dc:creator>BjornSvensson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-07T19:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Limitations for definition queries?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588580#M13189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That sounds very promising!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any suggestions for the most effective way to structure that kind of query?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Charlie Richman&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;DC Office of Planning&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588580#M13189</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieRichman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-08T12:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Limitations for definition queries?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588581#M13190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Try: OBJECTID NOT IN (1, 2, 3)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 17:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-api-for-flex-questions/limitations-for-definition-queries/m-p/588581#M13190</guid>
      <dc:creator>DasaPaddock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-08T17:14:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

