<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Licensing - Why do i need two licences to run extensions, when i use a license server. One for ArcMap and one for ArcGIS PRO? in Admin Tools Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/admin-tools-questions/licensing-why-do-i-need-two-licences-to-run/m-p/861747#M99</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one pc. On that i have ArcMap installed and borrowed an extension (DataInteroperability fx.) from our license server (ArcGIS Administrator). When i want to use the extension in ArcGIS PRO (installed on same pc with samt license manager), I must get one more license. Is that the right way to do it? Or is there another solution? I don't think it makes much sense that I am using double in licenses, which makes it harder for my collegues to get licenses. There must be a better way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Sanne&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SanneMikkelsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-05T12:52:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Licensing - Why do i need two licences to run extensions, when i use a license server. One for ArcMap and one for ArcGIS PRO?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/admin-tools-questions/licensing-why-do-i-need-two-licences-to-run/m-p/861747#M99</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have one pc. On that i have ArcMap installed and borrowed an extension (DataInteroperability fx.) from our license server (ArcGIS Administrator). When i want to use the extension in ArcGIS PRO (installed on same pc with samt license manager), I must get one more license. Is that the right way to do it? Or is there another solution? I don't think it makes much sense that I am using double in licenses, which makes it harder for my collegues to get licenses. There must be a better way?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;/Sanne&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:52:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/admin-tools-questions/licensing-why-do-i-need-two-licences-to-run/m-p/861747#M99</guid>
      <dc:creator>SanneMikkelsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-05T12:52:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Licensing - Why do i need two licences to run extensions, when i use a license server. One for ArcMap and one for ArcGIS PRO?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/admin-tools-questions/licensing-why-do-i-need-two-licences-to-run/m-p/861748#M100</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sanne,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be the right way to do that.&amp;nbsp; Since ArcGIS Pro and ArcMap are two separate programs you&amp;nbsp;would still need two separate licenses for those extensions, so you have been doing things the correct way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope this was helpful!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:06:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/admin-tools-questions/licensing-why-do-i-need-two-licences-to-run/m-p/861748#M100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-20T16:06:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

