<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Pro SDK Core Host should have access to Geoprocessing tools. in ArcGIS Pro SDK Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idi-p/1272481</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Pro SDK Core Host should have access to the Geoprocessing tools.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PascalVezina</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-03-28T14:44:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pro SDK Core Host should have access to Geoprocessing tools.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idi-p/1272481</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Pro SDK Core Host should have access to the Geoprocessing tools.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 14:44:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idi-p/1272481</guid>
      <dc:creator>PascalVezina</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-03-28T14:44:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro SDK Core Host should have access to Geoprocessing tools.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idc-p/1369555#M123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree. This would make automating tasks much simpler for those who are more familiar with .NET than with Python. Now that I've written a few batch scripts in Python, I'm more comfortable with arcpy, but if accessing GP tools from Core Host had been available, that would have sped up delivery times.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2024 14:23:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idc-p/1369555#M123</guid>
      <dc:creator>tempStephenRhea_NV5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-01-12T14:23:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro SDK Core Host should have access to Geoprocessing tools.</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idc-p/1562593#M155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've asked support about this, they suggested to use a Configuration instead of a core host application, but I agree on the subject and think that it should be part of the Core Host application sdk, We used to create a lot of batch applications using ArcObjects that have complex ERM, classes or tools that simply cannot be converted to python.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 12:44:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-ideas/pro-sdk-core-host-should-have-access-to/idc-p/1562593#M155</guid>
      <dc:creator>FrancescoGiovinazzo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-26T12:44:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

